[As I’ve done for the last few years, I wanted to start the New Year by looking back on some prior years that we can commemorate as anniversaries. Leading up to a weekend post with some 2023 predictions!]
On a few
key 1773 moments along the way to December’s Boston Tea Party.
1)
The
Tea Act: One of the many (many many) crucial historical issues about which
I knew very little for much of my AmericanStudying life was the role of the British
East India Company in American colonial and Revolutionary history (to say
nothing, as that hyperlinked article notes, of its roles in the whole world
during this period). It’s not just that the company dominated trade between so
much of the world, but also and even more importantly that the English government
was willing to do whatever it could to support that economic institution. One
such step was the Parliamentary Tea Act, which passed in April 1773 and went into
effect in May; the law granted the East India Company virtually sole
rights over the tea trade between England and the American colonies. This
was far from the first controversial such law—that would be the Stamp
Act of 1765—but it was another key step in the road toward Revolution.
2)
Franklin’s Satire: If laws were one form of
historical documents that helped precipitate those Revolutionary responses,
another of course were the impassioned and activist writings—often anonymous or
pseudonymous, but no less potent for it—produced by colonial leaders. In
September 1773, four months after the Tea Act went into effect, the London newspaper The Public Advertiser published such a work by none other than
Ben Franklin himself. Entitled “Rules by
Which a Great Empire May be Reduced to a Small One,” Franklin’s essay was
deeply satirical, poking fun at a number of British missteps but certainly
dwelling at length on precisely the kinds of economic extremes comprised by laws
like the Tea Act. It’s impossible to know whether the anger that led to the Tea
Party would have happened without this textual encouragement, but again these
different layers undoubtedly worked together at the very least.
3)
The
Dartmouth: Four total ships left
England in November 1773 with the first shipments of East India Company tea
affected by the new law; one (the
William) was lost at sea and the
other three arrived in Boston a few weeks later, with the first to dock being
the Dartmouth. As that first hyperlinked
article above highlights, the Dartmouth
had originated in Nantucket, reflecting the complex interconnections between
American shipping and these English companies and laws. Indeed, as I’ve argued both
here and in Of
Thee I Sing about Revolutionary War Loyalists, that community were just
as much part of America (and thus the new United States) as were the
revolutionaries. The Nantucket
Quaker Rotch family behind the Dartmouth
(and a second of the four ships, the Beaver) offer one small window into those multiple
American communities, all of which were present at the Boston Tea Party in
December 1773 to be sure.
Next
anniversary tomorrow,
Ben
PS. What do you think?
I've not considered Franklin's writings as a piece of the broader Tea Crisis. I'll have to add that to my list of the many moving pieces in 1773.
ReplyDeleteA couple corrections, if I may, there were 7 ships with tea sent to America: 4 to Boston, 1 each to NY, Philly, and Charleston. They left London mid-September to early-October. The William beached and the tea was salvaged, but no known duty was ever collected.
Thanks so much for this comment and those further details, Christopher (all of which I just saw today, sorry!)!
ReplyDelete