[60 years ago this month, President Lyndon B. Johnson—fresh off his successful re-election campaign—created his Great Society program, pushing Congress to help him (as he put it in his 1964 speech acceptance the presidential nomination) “build a great society, a place where the meaning of man’s life matches the marvels of man’s labor.” So this week I’ll AmericanStudy a number of Great Society laws, leading up to a post on what we still desperately need to learn from these histories.]
How the
Great Society reflected two distinct ways of thinking about health care, and why
the second in particular is still urgently needed.
One of the
life lessons we all learn—or rather we hope to live long enough to learn—is that
aging ain’t for the faint of heart. I don’t know how long exactly a relatively
healthy human body is designed (not in an Intelligent Design sense, to be
clear, just in the biology and chemistry/nature and evolution sense) to live,
but it seems clear to me that in the modern world our life expectancies well outpace
that plan, leading to all the potential (and likely, if not indeed inevitable)
health and medical issues that come with aging. Before the creation of Social
Security in the 1930s, aging Americans were pretty much entirely on their own
when it came to such challenges; but that new program alone wasn’t quite
sufficient to really deal with those health and medical realities, and so the
Great Society added a vital new element, the health insurance program for
seniors known
as Medicare. As the son to a pair of older parents, I’ve seen first-hand
how vital both Social Security and Medicare are to helping folks and families
navigate these inevitable challenges of aging, and I truly can’t imagine how anyone
survived the arc of life in America without them (and it seems clear that
many, many more folks did not, or at least did so with far more challenges
still).
Although Medicare
is an entirely communal and indeed a socialist program (yeah, I invoked the American
Bogeyman, but it’s the truth, folks), I would argue that it nonetheless
reflects an individual approach to health care, or rather a resource designed
to help individuals and families navigate their own health and medical
challenges. Given the Great Society’s emphases on both a “War on Poverty” and
social safety nets, it’s not surprising that in the same years—and indeed in
the same law, the Medicare
and Medicaid Act (also known as the Social Security Amendments) of 1965—the
administration also created a more overtly community-focused health insurance program,
Medicaid. Designed as a way to
guarantee a baseline level of health insurance and thus health care for the
most disadvantaged Americans, Medicaid quickly evolved to include a number of
related and even more overtly community-focused programs, including for example
the Children’s Health Insurance
Program (CHIP) that offers access to not just health insurance but also community
health programs for all American children and families.
Medicare
and Medicaid are in many ways, as their names suggest, parallel and complementary
programs. But I do believe that the latter is more community focused than the
former, and likewise and even more importantly represents a recognition that
health insurance and health care are communal needs, that access to them
profoundly affects not only individuals but also and in many ways especially communities
for the better (and the absence of them does so for the worse). One of the most
frustrating aspects of the last couple decades in American politics (an incredibly
long and competitive list to be sure) has been the collective unwillingness of
so many Americans to a) recognize that programs like Medicare and Medicaid are
already collective and governmental and, again, socialist; and b) extend that awareness
to a recognition that collective health insurance and policies, such as the
idea of “Medicare
for All,” would represent a vital step forward in guaranteeing access to
health insurance and care for all Americans. That’s one Great Society lesson we
desperately still need to learn.
Last Great
Society law tomorrow,
Ben
PS. What
do you think?
No comments:
Post a Comment