[This past weekend, I dropped off a piece of my heart in Nashville. So instead of my annual Charlottesville series, this week I’ll AmericanStudy a handful of Nashville contexts, leading up to a post on the city in 2024!]
On how a devastating
epidemic connected Nashville to the nation and world, and what it meant for
this particular community.
As is the
case it seems with most everyone who writes about the Nashville (and
Tennessee overall) cholera epidemics of the mid-19th century, everything
I know about these public health crises I learned from one contemporary and
impressively thorough book: physician William K. Bowling’s Cholera as it
Appeared in Nashville in 1849, 1850, 1854, and 1866 (1866). While
Bowling does indeed as his title suggests document and analyze four distinct
outbreaks of the hugely fatal disease, his focus is on the 1849 and 1850
epidemics, and for good reason: the 1849 epidemic took the lives of 311
Nashvillians (out of a total population of only 10,000 or so), and the 1850
epidemic nearly 500 (with 64 people dying in just the first four days of July 1850,
for example). Moreover, the 1849 outbreak produced one of the single most
noteworthy epidemic fatalities in American history: outgoing President
James K. Polk, who left office with the inauguration of his successor
Zachary Taylor in early
March 1849, toured the South with his wife Sarah for a few weeks, returned
to his home in Nashville (or rather
neighboring Columbia) in early April, and quite promptly fell ill with the
cholera that would kill him just two months later, on June 15, 1849.
That 1849 epidemic
in Nashville was part of what historians of medicine call the third global cholera
pandemic, an extended outbreak that seems to have begun around 1846 (when
more than 15,000 people died in the city of Mecca alone, for example) and is generally
seen as having continued until at least 1860 (although some
sources define the third pandemic more narrowly through its worst years, from
1852-1859). One of the most devastated cities was Liverpool,
a key embarkation point for immigrants to the U.S., and it was likely through
that connection that the disease spread so fully to much of America in these
years (although that narrative might also be due in part to anti-Irish
prejudice): thousands died in outbreaks in St.
Louis, Cincinnati, New Orleans, and New York
among other major cities; and the pandemic likewise apparently traveled with emigrants
on the Westward Trails during this Gold Rush period, with estimates of around
10,000 people having died on those trails between 1849 and 1855. In a
particularly painful way, that is, Nashville’s experiences of cholera in 1849
and 1850 represented the city’s true emergence, just a few decades after its charter
as I highlighted in yesterday’s post, as a more full part of the national and
global communities.
At the
same time, any community’s experience of an epidemic is specific, and it’s
important to think about that layer to cholera in mid-19th century
Nashville as well. The death of President Polk was one singular but symbolic
example of that kind of local effect, of course. But a more telling one is what
the epidemic meant for two distinct
African American communities in this antebellum Southern city: the more than
3000 enslaved African
Americans (a huge percentage of the city’s overall population of around
10,000); and the roughly 700 free
Blacks who lived in particular neighborhoods in (especially) North Nashville.
When the 1850 epidemic hit railroad
workers constructing a tunnel for the Nashville and Chattanooga line in
July and August 1850, for example, it was enslaved Black workers who bore the
worst of that outbreak, reflecting their particularly precarious position in
times of public health crisis (as at all times). Whereas we simply know far
less about the epidemic’s effects on the free Black community, a demographic on
which Bowling’s book remains largely silent, reflecting the difficulty of fully
remembering this small but vital part of antebellum Nashville. Just a few of
the many ways this global pandemic can illustrate specific Nashville histories
as well.
Next
Nashville context tomorrow,
Ben
PS. What
do you think? Nashville connections you’d highlight?
No comments:
Post a Comment