[With a new NBA season upon us, a series AmericanStudying some of basketball’s many interesting figures, stories, and debates. Leading up to a crowd-sourced weekend post on the bball stories, histories, debates, and contexts you’d highlight—share ‘em in comments or by email, please!]
On a clear
distinction between two iconic greats—and why it’s not quite so clear as that.
Between
1956 (when Bill
Russell was drafted by the Boston Celtics; Wilt
Chamberlain was officially drafted by the Philadelphia Warriors three
years later) and 1973 (when Chamberlain finished his last season with the Los
Angeles Lakers; Russell had ended his playing career with the Celtics four
years earlier), the National Basketball Association might as well have been
renamed the Russell-Chamberlain Association. Russell and the Celtics won 11 NBA
titles in those 18 years (1957, 1959-66, and 1968-69), while Chamberlain and
his teams won 2 (with the Philadelphia 76ers in 1967 and the Lakers in 1972). The
discrepancy between those two championship totals, and the fact that Russell’s
teams often beat Chamberlain’s in the playoffs en route to their titles (the
Celtics were 7-1 in playoff series against Chamberlain teams), has led many NBA fans
and basketball pundits to opine that
Russell clearly got the best of this truly unique rivalry. But while such
debates are fun for fans and historians alike, the truth is that these are two
of the all-time great NBA players, and there must be room in any account of the
sport for acknowledging and engaging with both men’s achievements and
successes.
Those
on-court achievements are the most important part of Russell and Chamberlain’s
careers and legacies—but if we turn our attention to their lives and
personalities off the court, it would be difficult to imagine a more
contrasting pair. Russell was (and has largely remained in the decades since
his retirement) notoriously prickly and private, not only with the media but
with fans and the public more generally, as illustrated (if in a particularly
divisive way) by his description of Boston as
a “flea market of racism” and his initial desire to have his jersey
retired in an empty Boston Garden. Chamberlain was (and largely
remained until his 1999 death) famously gregarious and social, as exemplified
(if in a particularly controversial way) by his claim (in his
1991 autobiography
A View from Above) that he had slept with roughly 20,000
women in his life. Those differences might help explain why Chamberlain only
coached for a year (with the
San Diego Conquistadors of the American Basketball Association),
while Russell not only coached
the Celtics for the final four years of his playing career (becoming one
of the first African American coaches in
professional sports in the process), but went on to coach two other teams in
the next two decades (the Seattle Supersonics in the mid-1970s and the
Sacramento Kings in the late 1980s).
Yet I
would argue that those seemingly divergent details and lives also reveal a
similar influence and factor for both men. In the interview at that last
hyperlink, Russell argues that his time as the Celtics’ player-coach had
nothing to do with race or racial progress; yet as his comments on Boston and
its fans reflect, Russell has consistently become—whatever his own overall
goals—a lightning rod of racial attitudes and debates in both the city and the
sport. For his side, Chamberlain denounced the Black Panthers and openly supported
Richard Nixon in both 1968 and 1972, separating himself very distinctly from
African American social movements of the era; yet from his college days at the University of
Kansas on through every
subsequent stage of his career and life, Chamberlain both
experienced direct instances of racism and was defined as a stereotypical black
man (never more so than in the aftermath of his sexual claims). Neither of
these two titans of the sport can or should be reduced to his race, but neither
is it possible to separate them from that aspect of their identity, even when
each has in some ways expressed a desire for such separation. Indeed, Russell
and Chamberlain’s careers marked a significant step in the NBA’s continued
evolution toward being the most
centrally African American sports league and community in America—one more
reason to remember their iconic presences and legacies.
Next bball
story tomorrow,
Ben
PS. What
do you think? Other bball stories, histories, or contexts you’d share?
No comments:
Post a Comment