[October 24th
will mark the 75th anniversary of the official establishment of the
United Nations. So this week I’ll AmericanStudy five histories connected to
the UN, leading up to a weekend post on global interconnectedness in 2020.]
What we can
learn from both the longest-running and a more recent UN
peacekeeping mission.
The first two
missions on which UN peacekeepers embarked have also proven to be the
organization’s longest-running international efforts. In 1948, the United Nations Truce Supervision
Organisation (UNTSO) sent peacekeepers to the Middle East to monitor a
ceasefire in Palestine between Israel and the coalition of Arab states that had
commenced
hostilities against the new nation on the day after the May 14th
proclamation of the Israeli state. In 1949, the United Nations
Military Observer Group in India and Pakistan (UNMOGIP) was created and
dispatched to the states of Jammu and Kashmir, in an effort to maintain a
ceasefire between India and Pakistan over those contested regions. In both of
these cases, multiple subsequent outbreaks of hostilities—and the uneasy peaces
that exist even when conflicts have not broken out—have required the
peacekeeping forces to remain in place; as we near the 70th
anniversary of both missions, it’s fair to say that UN peacekeepers now comprise
a permanent part of the community in these contested spaces.
In April 2014,
the UN authorized peacekeepers with the newly created United Nations
Multidimensional Integrated Stabilisation Mission in the Central African
Republic (MINUSCA; the UN does love its acronyms) to travel to that African
nation, hoping to alleviate some of the
human rights crises unfolding in the aftermath of civil conflict and
genocide and to help the nation transition back to stability. An African-led
effort, the International Support Mission in the Central African Republic
(MISCA), had already been in place, but in September
that organization formally transferred its authority to the UN
peacekeepers, ushering in the UN’s official role in the rebuilding nation. It’s
far too early to assess the outcome or success of this latest UN peacekeeping
mission, but as of the August 2015 moment in which I wrote this post, the
news isn’t good: a Rwandan peacekeeper working for the UN mission has
apparently shot and killed four of his colleagues and wounded four others. This
act of murder and perhaps terrorism is of course far from unique to the UN or
its peacekeepers, but it does reflect an uncomfortable truth about all of the
UN’s missions: that they are undertaken by people and groups just as flawed and
limited as in any other human endeavors, and yet are consistently asked to
perform heroic duties in the world’s worst situations.
It’s easy to see
that contradiction as the root of, or at least a primary factor in, the
inability of the Palestine and Kashmir peacekeeping missions to keep conflicts
and hostilities from reoccurring in those contested spaces; the UN peacekeepers
might not be responsible for the conflicts in the same way as the local
parties, that is, but they’re just as human and so just as unable to prevent
the conflicts as are even progressive leaders in those affected nations. A famous,
coincidental photograph which made the social media rounds in 2015 expresses
with particular clarity that cynical take on the peacekeepering missions and
their failures to change the realities on the ground. Yet on the other hand,
who’s to say that without the presence of the UN peacekeepers, conflicts in
Palestine and Kashmir (both of which include the
possibility of nuclear retaliation, let’s note) wouldn’t have intensified
far further and more destructively? After all, UN peacekeepers have completed 55
missions over the organization’s 70 years of existence, leaving these
affected nations and regions not perfect but unquestionably more stable and
healthy than would otherwise have been the case. While we can’t be naïve about
the realities, it’s nonetheless worth remembering and celebrating those
successes on this anniversary.
Special post
this weekend,
Ben
PS. What do you
think?
No comments:
Post a Comment