[October 24th
will mark the 75th anniversary of the official establishment of the
United Nations. So this week I’ll AmericanStudy five histories connected to
the UN, leading up to a weekend post on global interconnectedness in 2020.]
What three
representative UN leaders tell us about the organization and its histories.
1)
Dag
Hammarskjöld (1953-1961): Sweden’s Hammarskjöld was not the first elected
UN Secretary General (that honor went to Norway’s Trygve Lie), but I would
argue he was the first
to illustrate the new organization’s international influence. That was
particularly illustrated by the controversial 1960-1961
Congo Crisis, in which the precise nature of the UN’s involvement and
influence remains under
debate by historians. While the UN had not been able to prevent the Korean
War (a situation that contributed greatly to Lie’s
1952 resignation), in the Congo the organization wielded its power and
authority far more successfully, in the process shaping that nation’s and its
continent’s future for many years to come. While we might debate President John F. Kennedy’s statement
(after the Secretary General’s tragic death in a 1961 plane crash) that
Hammarskjöld was “the greatest statesman of our century,” he unquestionably
made the UN into far more of a global player than it had previously been.
2)
Javier Pérez de Cuéllar
(1982-1991): Each of the subsequent Secretary Generals have extended that
legacy, dealing with their own global crises and wielding the organization’s
authority and influence in their own ways. Peru’s de Cuéllar was the first
Secretary General from the Western Hemisphere, and on that level alone reflects
the organization and the world’s evolution into and beyond the 1980s. Moreover,
a number of the crises through which de Cuéllar led the UN connected closely to
postcolonial settings and issues as well: from mediating Britain and
Argentina’s disputes in the aftermath of the 1982 Falklands War and promoting
the 1983-4 work of the Contadora
Group (a transnational Central American organization working for regional
peace) to negotiating Namibia’s
1990 bid for independence from South Africa, among other moments. Such
issues had been part of the world for centuries, of course, but they gained
much greater visibility in the 1980s, and de Cuéllar’s UN reflected and
amplified that presence.
3)
Kofi Annan (1997-2006): Like
de Cuéllar, Ghana’s Annan was significant in part because of geography: he was
the first UN Secretary General from sub-Saharan Africa. But in many of his most
prominent actions and initiatives, Annan also helped usher the UN into the
new millennium, working to reform
and strengthen its management, secretariat and Security Council, and Human
Rights Council, among other efforts. It was in part for these necessary and
meaningful reforms, and in part for such pioneering initiatives as the UN Global Compact and The Global Fund (for AIDS,
Tuberculosis, and Malaria) that Annan and the UN were co-recipients of the 2001 (centennial)
Nobel Peace Prize. While the UN is far from perfect, as I’ll work to
analyze in the next two posts, Annan ensured that it would move into the 21st
century in evolving and vibrant ways, extending and deepening the legacy of
these prior Secretary Generals and of the organization’s global role and
impacts.
Last UN history
tomorrow,
Ben
PS. What do you
think?
No comments:
Post a Comment