[October 24th
will mark the 75th anniversary of the official establishment of the
United Nations. So this week I’ll AmericanStudy five histories connected to
the UN, leading up to a weekend post on global interconnectedness in 2020.]
On a potent
symbolic expression of memory and community.
In this
post on the histories and meanings of Northern California’s Muir Woods National Monument, I
highlighted a unique and striking May 19th, 1945 ceremony. On that
spring day representatives from 50 nations, in the midst of the meetings in San
Francisco that would produce the United Nations Charter,
traveled to the woods to commemorate Franklin Delano Roosevelt and the
histories and ideas that had led them and the world to this moment and the new
organization it would create. Roosevelt, who had died of a massive
cerebral hemorrhage just over a month before the ceremony (on April 12th),
had proposed (inspired by his visionary, activist Secretary
of the Interior Harold Ickes) that the conference as a whole take place at
Muir Woods. While that did not end up being the case, the May 19th
ceremony in the woods represented a clear way for the group to honor
Roosevelt’s vision, one cemented by their placing
of a commemorative plaque at the site’s sacred Cathedral Grove in tribute
to the fallen president and world leader.
The plaque and
tribute bring into stark focus the contrasts between Roosevelt’s role in the
origins of and support for the United Nations and those of Woodrow Wilson for
the League of Nations. There were of course numerous factors and histories that
contributed to those contrasts, and it’s neither fair nor productive to compare
the two presidents and moments (or the two world wars, for that matter) as if
they existed in a vacuum or on a level playing field. Yet without using the
contrast to judge or blame Wilson, necessarily, it is nonetheless instructive
to note Roosevelt’s far more consistent and successful connection to and
advocacy for the international organization he had helped found. Indeed, while
we might criticize the level of individual influence wielded by Roosevelt and
Winston Churchill in the UN’s origins, there can be little doubt that without
those two leading figures, and the ways in which they pushed their fellow Allied
leaders to sign and support the 1942 UN Declaration, the idea for the UN might
never have survived the subsequent years of war. For those and many other
reasons, the May 1945 ceremony and plaque rightly remembered and celebrated
Roosevelt’s foundational and vital role in the UN’s development.
The Muir Woods
ceremony did more than just remember a fallen leader, however. It also captured
two distinct but interconnected elements of an ideal global community, both
reflected in Harold
Ickes’s initial argument for holding the UN conference at the woods: “Not
only would this focus attention upon the nation’s interest in preserving these
mighty trees for posterity, but in such a ‘temple of peace’ the delegates would
gain a perspective and sense of time that could be obtained nowhere better than
in such a forest.” The first clause of Ickes’s inspiring sentence highlights
the global environmental advocacy toward
which the UN would move over the next half-century; such environmentalism was
of course not a focus of the organization’s wartime efforts, but could and did
become an important ongoing emphasis for such a groundbreaking international
entity. And Ickes’s second clause reflects the idea of a long view of global
history and community, one that does not focus simply on specific conflicts or
issues but also seeks to move beyond them and toward the kind of overarching understanding
of humanity and the world on which the survival of both those entities
ultimately depends. “The clearest way into the Universe is through a forest
wilderness,” Muir
himself argued—an idea expressed nicely by this symbolic and significant
1945 ceremony.
Next UN history
tomorrow,
Ben
PS. What do you
think?
No comments:
Post a Comment