[I can’t quite
believe it, but this week marks the 15th anniversary of Hurricane Katrina’s devastating
landfall in New Orleans. So this week I’ll AmericanStudy the hurricane, its
even more devastating aftermaths, and a few other contexts for this tragic
and telling 21st century story.]
On what we still
don’t talk about enough when it comes to the aftermaths of Katrina, and what we
don’t really talk about at all.
Not too long after
Katrina, I took part in a panel on Richard Wright at the American Literature
Association conference (in Boston in May 2007). Also on that panel was Jason Stupp, then a graduate
student at UConn (he’s now a faculty
member at Alfred State College in the SUNY system), who presented a
remarkable paper linking Wright’s
Native Son and particularly the
stereotypical constructions of Bigger Thomas by other characters and
communities in that novel to a striking post-Katrina text: the divergent captions
for two
nearly identical Associated Press images of New Orleans residents wading
through flood waters with supplies. The caption for an image of two white
residents described them as “finding bread and soda from a local grocery store,”
while the one for an image of a black resident said that he had been “looting a
grocery store.” As the hyperlinked New
York Times story illustrates, that discriminatory difference became for a
time national news (with the
photographer disputing any racial side to the captions, but I remain unconvinced),
helping to contextualize other post-Katrina moments like Kanye West’s famous
commentary (during a celebrity benefit effect for hurricane relief) that “George
Bush doesn’t care about black people.”
So we’ve
collectively engaged at least a bit with the fundamental, frustrating roles—both
symbolic and all too real—that race played in the aftermaths of Hurricane
Katrina. But I’m still not sure we’ve done so enough, and my argument for that position
can be boiled down to two words: Danziger
Bridge. On September
4th, 2005, six days after Katrina’s landfall, at least five New
Orleans police officers (three of them white, two of them African American) shot
at a number of unarmed civilians on that bridge, killing two (one a 40-year-old
mentally disabled man, Ronald Madison, who was shot in the back; the other
17-year-old James Brissette) and wounding four more, all of them African American.
The cops then repeatedly and collectively lied
about what had happened in an attempt to cover up the murders. The shooting
and its many legal follow ups have received some journalistic and public attention
over the years, but not nearly as much as is warranted by such an outrageous
story, one that echoes the numerous police shootings of unarmed African
Americans but amplifies it by a factor of at least six. We can debate
terminology or semantics, but to my mind this was unquestionably a racist
massacre (and no, I don’t think it matters that a couple of the cops were black—there’s
a reason why “blue lives matter” is presented as an entirely distinct frame
from “black lives matter,” after all).
So we still need
to talk more about the role that race played in the horrific effects and aftermaths
of Katrina. But there’s another, not unrelated but also distinct issue that if
anything we’ve talked about even less: the controversial
use of the U.S. military in an American city. That hyperlinked article
makes the case that the federal government did not deploy the military to New
Orleans (due to the Posse
Comitatus Act), which may be technically correct; but the National
Guard were deployed for months (as, that article notes, were private security
forces employed by Blackwater), with an explicit goal of “fighting the
insurgency in the city” (a direct quote from the Guard, per that hyperlinked Mother Jones article once more). Fighting
an insurgency! In an American city! And one devastated by a still unfolding
natural and man-made disaster! Sorry for all the exclamation points, but in
this case I believe they are quite appropriate and necessary. In the 15 years
since Katrina, the Guard’s
and government’s roles in the city have been consistently framed as
disaster relief, and obviously that was part of what they did; but it’s not all
that they did, and indeed not how they framed their own mission at the time. That
seems like a pretty significant American story, and one we most definitely need
to talk about more.
Next
KatrinaStudying tomorrow,
Ben
PS. What do you
think? Other Katrina histories or contexts you’d highlight?
No comments:
Post a Comment