[Happy Banned Books Week! In high school I had
a deeply nerdy sweatshirt
that read “Celebrate Freedom: Read a Banned Book”; this week I’ll do so by
AmericanStudying books that have been frequently banned, in the past or
recently. And yeah, read a Banned Book this week!]
On two iconic, frequently
banned or challenged
YA novels that fractured my innocence right alongside that of their
characters.
The early teenage years—those of late middle school into the beginning of
high school—seem to resonate particularly well with the idea of a loss of
innocence. I’m sure that kids who grow up in far more difficult situations than
I did, or who have to deal with loss at a young age, or otherwise are
confronted with the world’s darker realities experience the shift from innocence to experience, naiveté to maturity, earlier. But even those of us who make it through
childhood unscathed are going to come up against the harsher sides to life at
some point, and ages 12-15 seems like a pretty common such milestone. I say
that partly as a kid who was badly hazed by his cross country teammates during
his freshman year of high school—but also partly the one who read John Knowles’
A Separate Peace (1959) and Robert
Cormier’s The Chocolate War (1974) and Beyond the Chocolate War (1985) in 8th grade.
I’d be lying if I said I remember much at all of the three books—that’s
about 30 years, and a whole lot of books, under the bridge. But what I do
remember are a couple of specific and very dark moments, of literal and
symbolic falls: the seemingly accidental fall that Knowles’ protagonist Gene
purposefully causes his friend Finny to take, a fall that eventually leads to
Finny’s death (among other destructive effects); and a profoundly disturbing
suicide scene in Cormier’s sequel, one that locates readers in the perspective
of a young student leaping to his death after being ostracized and abused for
his homosexuality by his peers and even a teacher. Obviously those weren’t the
first literary deaths I had encountered—in 6th grade English I read
Agatha Christie’s Ten Little Indians/And Then There Were None (1939), for crying out loud!—but they might have been
the first in which kids my own age were killed, at least in such purposeful and
brutal ways (ie, not the accidental drowning in Katherine Paterson’s Bridge to Terabithia [1977], traumatic as that was for this young reader).
Perhaps it was that sense of proximity and (in a way) threat to myself that
led these particular moments, and the novels in which they occur, to hit me as
hard as they did. Perhaps it was that all three books are deeply concerned with
what it means to be a teenage boy, in some of the better but (I would argue)
mostly some of the worst senses. And perhaps it’s a tribute to their
interesting and almost entirely implicit engagement with the wars during which
they’re set—Knowles does have his characters engage with World War II toward the end of his
novel; I don’t believe Cormier mentions Vietnam at all, certainly not at
length, but his titular war certainly gestures in that direction. War, after
all, has long been one of the most overt and catastrophic ways in which young
men—and their societies—lose their innocence; in my reading of these young
adult novels and their effects on me, I was led to feel such effects far more
intimately than might otherwise have been the case. One of many arguments for teaching,
or at least for not banning, these YA novels.
Next banned book
tomorrow,
Ben
PS. What do you
think? Banned books you’d highlight?
No comments:
Post a Comment