[March 17th
is St. Patrick’s Day, a holiday
that is apparently a far
bigger deal in the U.S. than in Ireland. So this week I’ll AmericanStudy a
handful of famous Irish American cultural figures, leading up to a post on some wonderful Irish
American literary voices!]
On O’Keeffe,
Alfred Stieglitz, and the similar yet often opposing pulls of artistic and
romantic passions.
In her
seminal 1963 text
“The Problem That Has No Name” (that’s just an excerpt), the opening
chapter in her equally pioneering The Feminine Mystique, Betty
Friedan focuses on a variety of complex issues and struggles facing young
married women, from media images and gender ideals to the day to day challenges
of marriage, parenting, and home. Yet at heart of her analyses, at the core of
that unnamed problem, lies a pair of contradictory pulls: on the one hand the
desires for family, for marriage, for romantic and human connections; and on
the other the desires for education, for career, for individual and
professional successes. While there’s no doubt that the 1950s society Friedan
analyzes privileged the former over the latter for these young women, I think
she recognizes—and I know I would argue—that both pulls are also a part of most
individuals, and that their contradictions thus stem at least in part from the
complexities of our own identities and lives.
Those
contradictions and complexities affect all of us who hope to balance family and
career, but they are perhaps particularly pronounced for artists, and even more
especially in artistic geniuses. While the idea of a “muse” might be somewhat
clichéd, it also accurately defines the way in which great artists are so often
pulled to do their work, driven to produce by the same kinds of obsessions and
forces that can characterize romantic connection and passion. Certainly that
seems to have been the case for the Irish American modernist painter Georgia O’Keeffe, both in
her pursuit of her artistic career and in her lifelong romantic connection to
photographer Alfred
Stieglitz. That connection, which began in 1916 when O’Keeffe was 28 (and
Stieglitz 52 and married), led to a professional partnership and a multi-decade
marriage, and did not end until his death in 1946, was captured and preserved
in the
roughly 25,000 letters sent between the two; My Faraway One, the first of two planned volumes of selected
letters, was published last year.
I don’t want
to reduce O’Keeffe and Stieglitz’s relationship to any one issue, no more than
one painting or photograph could illustrate each artist’s career and talents.
Yet it seems clear that O’Keeffe’s 1929 decision to move back west—she had come
to New York in 1918 to live and work with Stieglitz, and they had been married
in 1924—and live in the burgeoning artistic community of Taos, New Mexico (at the home
and compound of Mable
Dodge Luhan) was a true turning point, a moment when the painter chose to
follow her craft and muse (which the west unquestionably was to O’Keeffe). When
Stieglitz wrote to her that “I am broken” (and sent her the above picture with
one of his July 1929 letters), she responded with one of the most powerful
statements of that artistic pursuit: “There is much life in me … I realized it
would die if it could not move toward something … I chose coming away because
here at least I feel good – and it makes me feel I am growing very tall and
straight inside – and very still.” Their marriage survived and endured, and
American art and culture were significantly enriched by O’Keeffe’s works. Not a
bad love story all the way around.
Next Irish
American tomorrow,
Ben
PS. What do you
think? Other Irish Americans you’d highlight?
No comments:
Post a Comment