[October 24th
will mark the 70th anniversary of the official establishment of the
United Nations. So this week I’ll AmericanStudy five histories connect to
the UN, leading up to a weekend post on the worst and best of the US’s
relationship to the organization.]
On a potent
symbolic expression of memory and community.
In this
post on the histories and meanings of Northern California’s Muir Woods National Monument, I highlighted
a unique and striking May 19th, 1945 ceremony. On that spring day representatives
from 50 nations, in the midst of the meetings in San Francisco that would
produce the United Nations
Charter, traveled to the woods to commemorate Franklin Delano Roosevelt and
the histories and ideas that had led them and the world to this moment and the
new organization it would create. Roosevelt, who had died of a massive
cerebral hemorrhage just over a month before the ceremony (on April 12th),
had proposed (inspired by his visionary, activist Secretary
of the Interior Harold Ickes) that the conference as a whole take place at
Muir Woods. While that did not end up being the case, the May 19th
ceremony in the woods represented a clear way for the group to honor Roosevelt’s
vision, one cemented by their placing
of a commemorative plaque at the site’s sacred Cathedral Grove in tribute
to the fallen president and world leader.
The plaque and
tribute bring into stark focus the contrasts between Roosevelt’s role in the origins
of and support for the United Nations and those of Woodrow Wilson for the
League of Nations. There were of course numerous factors and histories that
contributed to those contrasts, and it’s neither fair nor productive to compare
the two presidents and moments (or the two world wars, for that matter) as if
they existed in a vacuum or on a level playing field. Yet without using the contrast
to judge or blame Wilson, necessarily, it is nonetheless instructive to note
Roosevelt’s far more consistent and successful connection to and advocacy for
the international organization he had helped found. Indeed, while we might
criticize the level of individual influence wielded by Roosevelt and Winston
Churchill in the UN’s origins, there can be little doubt that without those two
leading figures, and the ways in which they pushed their fellow Allied leaders
to sign and support the 1942 UN Declaration, the idea for the UN might never
have survived the subsequent years of war. For those and many other reasons,
the May 1945 ceremony and plaque rightly remembered and celebrated Roosevelt’s
foundational and vital role in the UN’s development.
The Muir Woods
ceremony did more than just remember a fallen leader, however. It also captured
two distinct but interconnected elements of an ideal global community, both
reflected in Harold
Ickes’s initial argument for holding the UN conference at the woods: “Not
only would this focus attention upon the nation’s interest in preserving these
mighty trees for posterity, but in such a ‘temple of peace’ the delegates would
gain a perspective and sense of time that could be obtained nowhere better than
in such a forest.” The first clause of Ickes’s inspiring sentence highlights
the global environmental advocacy toward
which the UN would move over the next half-century; such environmentalism was
of course not a focus of the organization’s wartime efforts, but could and did
become an important ongoing emphasis for such a groundbreaking international
entity. And Ickes’s second clause reflects the idea of a long view of global history
and community, one that does not focus simply on specific conflicts or issues
but also seeks to move beyond them and toward the kind of overarching
understanding of humanity and the world on which the survival of both those
entities ultimately depends. “The clearest way into the Universe is through a
forest wilderness,” Muir
himself argued—an idea expressed nicely by this symbolic and significant 1945
ceremony.
Next UN history
tomorrow,
Ben
PS. What do you
think?
No comments:
Post a Comment