[On December 14th, 1950, the United Nations adopted its Statute on the UN High Commissioner for Refugees. So for the 75th anniversary of that important moment, this week I’ll AmericanStudy the UNHCR and other refugee stories, leading up to a weekend post on that fraught and crucial issue in 2025.]
[Note:
This post was originally from 2019, but let’s just say it hasn’t gotten less
relevant in the six years since.]
Three ways
to contextualize and analyze the 1980
exodus of some 125,000
Cubans (known as Marielitos) from Mariel Harbor to the
United States.
1)
Refugee policy: Donald Trump’s Executive
Orders on refugees and immigration have of course brought debates over
refugee policy back into the news, but in a particularly
oversimplified—and fearful and paranoid and factually challenged—way. The
situation and issues facing President Jimmy Carter in 1980, on the other hand,
illustrate just how complex and multi-layered national decisions about refugee
policy are (even for those of us, like me and I believe Carter, who feel
strongly that the U.S. should always try to welcome refugees). There are the
perspectives and realities of a sovereign nation like Cuba, and of our own
evolving relationship with that nation (Carter and
Castro had worked to alleviate some tensions between the two nations
over the years leading up to Mariel). There are the humanitarian and practical
questions of where and how the refugees will be resettled in the United States,
and what that will mean for the communities to which they arrive (Miami was
most definitely and profoundly changed by
the Marielitos). And there are the thorny but inevitable comparative
questions—what do our decisions in response to this particular refugee
community mean for the millions of others seeking and waiting for the chance to
asylum? All difficult issues, and all raised with clarity by the Mariel
boatlift.
2)
The boatlift in art: Refugee and immigration
histories aren’t just about governments and policies, though—they’re also and
most importantly about communities and stories, about identities and lives.
Artistic and cultural texts are particularly good at portraying those latter
sides to histories, and I would highlight three very distinct such texts about
the Mariel boatlift. The Brian De Palma film Scarface (1983)
uses the story of one fictional Marielito, Tony Montana (Al Pacino in one of his most famous
performances), to consider some of our most overarching national narratives,
from the ideals of the American Dream to the most sordid nightmares of violence
and crime. Christine
Bell’s novel The Pérez Family
(1991;
adapted into a 1995
film) focuses more fully on themes of community, both among the
Marielitos (the protagonists are characters who share the same last name and
decide to pass as a family) and in relationship to the Cuban-American community
(Juan Pérez is looking for his wife, who has already been in the United States
for decades by the time he arrives). And Reinaldo Arenas’ autobiography Before Night Falls (1992;
adapted into a
2000 film) tells the harrowing story of one individual writer before,
during, and after the boatlift. Each text is different in medium and genre as
well as story and theme, but taken together they offer a powerful artistic
portrayal of the boatlift.
3)
Pedro Zamora: For better or for worse, the
fictional gangster Tony Montana is probably the most famous individual
Marielito. But I believe a close second would be Pedro Zamora, who came
to the United States with his family in the boatlift when he was only 8 years
old, and came to prominence 14 years later as the breakout star of The Real World:
San Francisco, the 1994 third season of MTV’s
ground-breaking reality TV show. Zamora broke multiple cultural barriers during
his time on television: he was one of the first openly gay
stars of a TV show, and his commitment
ceremony with boyfriend Sean Sasser the first such same-sex ceremony in
TV history; and he was also living with
HIV/AIDS throughout the show, bringing a profoundly intimate and human
face to a disease
that was, at the time, still deeply controversial and feared. Zamora’s
tragic death later that year, and his widely broadcast memorial service, offered
one more level to that prominence and its effects. None of those events or
effects are limited to Marielitos or Cuban Americans, of course; but we can’t
understand and analyze Zamora’s identity, nor perhaps appreciate his commitment
to public advocacy and activism, without remembering the foundational role of
the Mariel boatlift in his life.
Next story
tomorrow,
Ben
PS. What
do you think?
No comments:
Post a Comment