[For this year’s
installment in my
annual Halloween series,
I’ll be AmericanStudying serial killers in American culture and history. Add
your boos and other thoughts in comments, please!]
On two striking
similarities and one important difference in a pair of pop culture serial
killer texts.
Norman
Mailer’s The Executioner’s Song
(1979) and Bruce
Springsteen’s “Nebraska” (1982) both consistently link the story of their
real-life serial killer protagonists—Gary Gilmore in
Mailer’s novel and Charles
Starkweather in Springsteen’s song—to key women in the men’s lives. Although
Mailer’s opening section is titled “Gary,” it begins instead with the
perspective of Brenda Nicol, a cousin and childhood friend of Gilmore’s who
remained linked to him through his final killing spree; parts two and three are
titled “Nicole” and “Gary and Nicole,” after the girlfriend (Nicole
Barrett) who stayed with Gary through his execution and on whom much of
Mailer’s portrait of Gilmore focuses. Similarly, Springsteen’s song uses the 19
year old Starkweather’s relationship with 14 year old Caril Ann Fugate, who
accompanied Starkweather while he took part in his own killing spree, as its
linchpin, from the song’s opening lines, “I saw her standin’ on her front
lawn/just twirlin’ her baton,” through to Starkweather’s culminating desire to
have Fugate “sitting right there on my lap” when he is executed. These family
and romantic relationships certainly humanize Mailer and Springsteen’s
protagonists, but they also seem tied to the men’s crimes in complex ways that
echo the links between sex and horror I discussed in yesterday’s post.
Mailer’s and
Springsteen’s works also similarly feature a near-complete disappearance of
their creators in the course of the texts. That’s perhaps more expected in a song
like Springsteen’s, but I don’t just mean that Springsteen doesn’t refer to
himself in any overt way; even the voice in which he sings “Nebraska” is
strikingly affected and distinct from Bruce’s own (and an entire departure from
the voice in which he had sung any of his five prior albums), and since this
was the first song on the album, would have taken contemporary listeners
entirely by surprise. The absence of Norman Mailer from his book is more
striking still, as the book is as the subtitle puts it “A True Life Novel,” and
one based (as he writes in a brief “Afterword”) on extensive interviews and
conversations between Mailer, Gilmore, and many other individuals. Yet to the
best of my recollection Mailer does not appear anywhere in the book’s more than
1000 pages, engaging with his role in producing the text (and even
participating in the text’s events in the closing period of Gilmore’s life) only
in that brief concluding coda. As a result, Mailer’s mammoth book feels as closely
focused on Gilmore and everything within and connected to his life and identity
as Springsteen’s intimate song does on Starkweather, even though in both cases
the texts are the careful, artistic constructions of two deeply talented creators
in their respective genres.
There’s one key
formal difference between the two texts, though, and it significantly impacts
their portrayals of the two serial killers. As he does with all but one of the
songs on Nebraska, Springsteen sings
the title track in the first-person, speaking directly as Starkweather (the
only historical figure among the album’s first-person speakers); Mailer’s book
features a fully omniscient third-person narrator, one who can provide the
perspectives of any and all of his historical figures (including Brenda and
Nicole among many others) alongside Gary’s. Due in large part to that narrative
distinction, Springsteen’s song forces its audience into a direct and
unfiltered relationship with Starkweather’s raw voice and cynical worldview, as
in its nihilistic concluding lines: “They wanted to know why I did what I did/Well
sir I guess there’s just a meanness in this world.” Mailer’s more sweeping
narration, on the other hand, situates Gilmore as part of broader communities
(family, romantic relationships, neighborhood, prison, region, nation) and
offers more of a sociological than a psychological engagement with his identity
and perspective. I wouldn’t say Executioner’s
Song is optimistic, exactly, but it certainly offers its audience more ways
to understand its serial killer subject than does “Nebraska”—while the latter
lets us see through that subject’s eyes, whether we want to or not.
Next killers
tomorrow,
Ben
PS. What do you
think? Other American killers or scares you’d highlight?
No comments:
Post a Comment