[For each of the
last couple years, I’ve featured a Halloween-inspired
series. It’s been spoooooky fun, so I figured I’d continue the tradition
this year, focusing specifically on scary movies. Share your thoughts, on these
or other AmericanSpookings, and I promise not to say boo!]
On the horrifying
xenophobia at the heart of two recent hit films.
It’s hard
to argue with success, and Eli Roth’s Hostel (2005) and Pierre Morel’s Taken (2008) are by many measures two of the most
successful films of the last decade. Hostel
made more than $80 million worldwide (on a budget of $4.5 million), led to
a sequel two years later, and contributed significantly to the rise of an
entirely new sub-gerne (the horror
sub-genre generally known as “torture porn”). Taken
cost a lot more to make (budget of $25 million) but also made a lot more at the
box office (worldwide gross of over $225 million), has its own sequel coming
out later this year, and fundamentally changed the career
arc and general perception of its star Liam Neeson. Neither
film was aiming for any Oscars or to make the Sight and
Sound list, but clearly both did what they were trying to do well enough to
please their audiences and hit all the notes in their generic (in the literal
sense) formulas.
What the
two films were trying to do is, of course, a matter of interpretation and
debate (although
Eli Roth is more than happy to tell us his take on what his film is about);
moreover, they’re clearly very different from each other, in genre and goal and
many other ways, and I don’t intend to conflate them in this post. Yet they
both share an uncannily similar basic plot: naïve and fun-loving young American
travelers are abducted and tortured by evil European captors, against whom the
travelers themselves (in Hostel) or
the traveler’s badass special forces type Dad (in Taken; young
Maggie Grace apparently gets to fight some of her own fights against additional
Euro-types in the sequel) have to fight in order to escape. While it’s
possible to argue that the travelers in Roth’s film help bring on their own
torture as a result of their chauvanistic attitudes toward European women (in the
sequel Roth made his protagonists young women, and much more explicitly
innocent ones at that), there’s no question that the true forces of
evil in each film are distinctly European. Moreover, since all of the young
travelers are explicitly constructed as tourists, hoping to experience the
different world of Europe, the films can’t help but seem like cautionary tales
about that world’s dangerous and destructive underbelly.
It’s that
last point which I’d really want to emphasize here. After all, bad guys in both
horror and action films can and do come from everywhere, and that doesn’t
necessarily serve as a blanket indictment of those places; if anything, I would
argue that the
multi-national and multi-ethnic villainy of (for example) James Bond films is a thematic
strength, making clear that evil can and will be found everywhere. Yet both Hostel
and Taken are precisely about, or
at least originate with, the relationship between American travelers and
Europeans, about the naïve ideals of cultural tourism and about creating plots
that depend on very frightening and torturous realities within these foreign
worlds. “Don’t travel to Europe, young people,” they seem to argue; and if you
do, well, be prepared either to kill a ton of ugly Europeans (or have your
Daddy do it) or to be killed by them. Not exactly the travel narrative I’d
argue for, and indeed a terrifying contribution to our 21st century
American worldview.
Last AmericanSpooking
tomorrow,
Ben
PS. What do you
think? Spooky films (or other texts) you’d highlight?
No comments:
Post a Comment