[50 years ago this week, Vice President Spiro Agnew resigned. That striking political moment was not only part of the deepening Watergate scandal, but one of the few times when an American Vice President has made major news. So this week I’ll AmericanStudy Agnew and other noteworthy Veeps, leading up a weekend post on our current VP!]
On one very good
and one very bad thing about the crucial wartime election.
I’ve blogged
before about the moment in which I’d argue (hyperbolically to be sure, but
not, I believe, without cause) that the Civil War and thus the fate of the
American future most clearly hung in the balance: the second day of the Battle
of Gettysburg, and specifically Joshua Chamberlain and the
20th Maine’s stand on Little Round Top. Even if I’m being too
extreme about that particular moment, it’s certainly fair to say that after Gettysburg the
Confederacy stood very little chance of winning the war militarily. But on
the other hand, much remained uncertain and undetermined about the war’s final
stages, outcome, and aftermath, and no single moment more decisively impacted
those futures than the presidential
election of 1864.
For a number of
reasons, President Lincoln’s ultimately decisive victory over Democratic
challenger (and former terrible Union general) George
McClellan was a very positive result. For one thing, despite the eventual
size of that victory (212 to 21 electoral votes, and a popular vote margin of
more than 400,000), it was hardly a foregone conclusion: for much of 1864 the
war was going poorly enough that Lincoln’s chances, particularly when coupled
with John
C. Frémont’s initial presence in the race as a third-party
candidate, seemed gloomy at best. And for another, related thing, had
McClellan triumphed he almost certainly would have negotiated
a peace with the Confederacy (that was his stated platform and plan) that
would have made such outcomes as the
1865 passage of the 13th-15th Amendments far more
difficult, if not indeed impossible.
So it’s a very
good thing that Lincoln won reelection. But in order to strengthen his chances
of doing so, Lincoln and the Republican Party did a very bad thing: nominating Andrew Johnson,
Tennessee’s Military Governor and a lifelong Southern Democrat, as Lincoln’s
second Vice President (replacing his first, former Maine Governor and longtime
Republican Hannibal
Hamlin). Perhaps Johnson helped assure that victory, although by election
day, with Frémont and his third party out of the race and the war going much
better, it’s doubtful that his contribution was required. Far more certain is
that, after Lincoln’s tragic assassination, the presidency of Andrew Johnson
was one of the worst and most destructive in our nation’s history, culminating
both in his
near-impeachment (the first in American history) and, much worse, in a very
different vision of Reconstruction than what
Lincoln had begun. It can be easy to overlook VP nominations, but Johnson’s
proves just how significant that element of an election can become.
Next
VeepStudying tomorrow,
Ben
PS. What
do you think? Vice Presidents you’d highlight?
No comments:
Post a Comment