[For the rest of this week, I’ll be providing updates on a few topics from my hometown of Charlottesville about which I’ve blogged previously. Leading up to a special weekend tribute to an influential Cville figure I got to see again earlier this summer!]
Now that the infamous
Lee and Jackson statues will finally be
coming down, thoughts on a few of the possible next steps for them:
1)
Museums: This would seem to be the obvious
choice, as a way to preserve the statues (I would always put it that way,
rather than preserve “history”; the statues are a commemoration of the past, or
rather a mythologized version of it) while removing them from the central and
prominent civic space they’ve so long occupied. But as Kevin Levin and others
have argued, a great deal would depend on what museum we’re talking about. If they
went to one of the many propagandistic
spaces that commemorate the
Confederacy, I think their pernicious presence and influence could very
well continue. That might even be the case at a more neutral history museum, since
they in and of themselves are anything but neutral. I would be okay with the
thought of moving them, however, to an exhibition on (for example) white
supremacy and public spaces in the National
Museum of African American History & Culture.
2)
Melting: At the other end of the spectrum from
preserving the statues would be melting them down. I’ll admit that this one has
a great deal of appeal to me, particularly as a symbolic statement of
dismantling these dominant white supremacist narratives; I also think it could
be striking and powerful if statues were melted down and then the materials
were used to create new memorials to the countless forgotten or
under-remembered figures who embody an inspiring inclusive America. But at the
same time, it’s impossible to dispute that the imagery of burning and destroying
public art conjures up authoritarian and fascist
regimes and histories; and even though I believe of course that these
efforts would be in service of far different causes, if I’m arguing for
symbolic value I certainly have to recognize other possible and far worse
symbolisms.
3)
More Voices: So far, the debate over
Charlottesville’s statues, like that over Confederate statues and memorials
throughout the nation, seems to have been dominated by two communities: racist
white supremacists like those who marched
in Cville in August 2017; and (I would of course argue) more well-informed
and –intentioned white people like myself. As my Cville friend Sally Duncan
argues so thoughtfully at the end of this Cville Weekly article, however, it is Black Americans who
should ultimately have the central say in what’s next: not only because they
were the target of these rhetorically and actually violent histories; but also
because in so many cases, including these downtown Cville parks, the spaces
were constructed by displacing
African American homes and communities. Which is to say, on this issue, as
much as I might have to say, it’s time for me to shut up and listen.
Next update
tomorrow,
Ben
PS. What do you
think?
No comments:
Post a Comment