[June 6th marks the NBA’s 75th birthday, so this week I’ll AmericanStudy a handful of basketball figures and stories. Leading up to a crowd-sourced weekend post on the bball stories, histories, and contexts you’d highlight—share ‘em in comments or by email, please!]
On a clear
distinction between two iconic greats—and why it’s not quite so clear as that.
Between 1956
(when Bill
Russell was drafted by the Boston Celtics; Wilt
Chamberlain was officially drafted by the Philadelphia Warriors three years
later) and 1973 (when Chamberlain finished his last season with the Los Angeles
Lakers; Russell had ended his playing career with the Celtics four years earlier),
the National Basketball Association might as well have been renamed the
Russell-Chamberlain Association. Russell and the Celtics won 11 NBA titles in
those 18 years (1957, 1959-66, and 1968-69), while Chamberlain and his teams
won 2 (with the Philadelphia 76ers in 1967 and the Lakers in 1972). The
discrepancy between those two championship totals, and the fact that Russell’s
teams often beat Chamberlain’s in the playoffs en route to their titles (the
Celtics were 7-1 in playoff series against Chamberlain teams), has led many NBA
fans and basketball pundits to opine
that Russell clearly got the best of this truly unique rivalry. But while
such debates are fun for fans and historians alike, the truth is that these are
two of the all-time great NBA players, and there must be room in any account of
the sport for acknowledging and engaging with both men’s achievements and
successes.
Those on-court
achievements are the most important part of Russell and Chamberlain’s careers
and legacies—but if we turn our attention to their lives and personalities off
the court, it would be difficult to imagine a more contrasting pair. Russell
was (and has largely remained in the decades since his retirement) notoriously
prickly and private, not only with the media but with fans and the public more
generally, as illustrated (if in a particularly divisive way) by his
description of Boston
as a “flea market of racism” and his initial desire to have his jersey
retired in an empty Boston Garden. Chamberlain was (and largely remained
until his 1999 death) famously gregarious and social, as exemplified (if in a
particularly controversial way) by his claim
(in his 1991 autobiography
A View from Above) that he had slept with roughly 20,000
women in his life. Those differences might help explain why Chamberlain only
coached for a year (with
the San Diego Conquistadors of the American Basketball Association), while
Russell not only coached
the Celtics for the final four years of his playing career (becoming one of
the first African American coaches in
professional sports in the process), but went on to coach two other teams in
the next two decades (the Seattle Supersonics in the mid-1970s and the Sacramento
Kings in the late 1980s).
Yet I would
argue that those seemingly divergent details and lives also reveal a similar
influence and factor for both men. In the interview at that last hyperlink,
Russell argues that his time as the Celtics’ player-coach had nothing to do
with race or racial progress; yet as his comments on Boston and its fans
reflect, Russell has consistently become—whatever his own overall goals—a
lightning rod of racial attitudes and debates in both the city and the sport. For
his side, Chamberlain denounced the Black Panthers and openly supported
Richard Nixon in both 1968 and 1972, separating himself very distinctly
from African American social movements of the era; yet from his college days at the
University of Kansas on through every
subsequent stage of his career and life, Chamberlain both experienced
direct instances of racism and was defined as a stereotypical black man (never
more so than in the aftermath of his sexual claims). Neither of these two
titans of the sport can or should be reduced to his race, but neither is it
possible to separate them from that aspect of their identity, even when each
has in some ways expressed a desire for such separation. Indeed, Russell and
Chamberlain’s careers marked a significant step in the NBA’s continued
evolution toward being the most
centrally African American sports league and community in America—one more
reason to remember their iconic presences and legacies.
Next bball story
tomorrow,
Ben
PS. What do you
think? Other bball stories, histories, or contexts you’d share?
No comments:
Post a Comment