[On April
10th, 1925, F. Scott Fitzgerald’s The Great Gatsby was published. So this week I’ll AmericanStudy Gatsby and other contenders for the
elusive Great
American Novel crown, leading up to a special weekend post on some recent
contenders!]
On a character
whose presence and absence both reflect a novel’s greatness.
I’ve written a
great deal in this space about my favorite American novel, Charles
Chesnutt’s The Marrow of Tradition
(1901). I mean it, a
great deal. Like, a
ton. Seriously.
All of those posts help make the case for Marrow’s
greatness, so I’ll cut this paragraph short in honor of all the reading I’m
already asking you to do here!
Welcome back!
Today I want to highlight another layer to Marrow’s
greatness: the minor character Lee Ellis. A young white journalist who works
for the Morning Chronicle (the white
supremacist newspaper edited by the novel’s white protagonist, Major Philip
Carteret), and one leg of the novel’s love triangle plot, Ellis reflects the
truly multi-faceted complexity and humanity that Chesnutt brings to every
character in his fictional town of Wellington, North Carolina. In only a
handful of moments and chapters, we learn about Ellis’s Quaker background in a
small Southern town, and what that means for his perspective on issues such as
race, segregation, and lynching; about his code of personal and civic ethics
and how it informs his actions in both romantic and homosocial settings; and
about the limits to this character’s inspiring and even idealized perspective
and identity, especially when faced with the horrors of the novel’s
climactic, historical violence. All of those layers and complexities could
make Ellis a compelling protagonist for many historical novels, but Chesnutt
dispenses with them in a handful of perfectly-wrought scenes.
And that
relative absence, even more than his compelling presence, is what makes Ellis
emblematic of Marrow’s greatness.
First of all, it reflects Chesnutt’s willingness to take the character most
likely to elicit a progressive white reader’s sympathies and generally sideline
him, especially in a climactic section that quite simply refuses to give
audiences any easy answers. And second of all, Ellis’s relative absence
reflects the novel’s central focus (in the sections focused on white
characters, at least) on Philip Carteret and his wife Olivia, both of whom are
far less sympathetic, far more linked to overt white supremacy (in Philip’s
case) or blatant bigotry and prejudice (in Olivia’s), and yet imbued with the
same multi-layered humanity that Chesnutt brings to all his characters. American
historical fiction is full of characters like Lee Ellis, embodying as he does Georg
Lukács’s
concept of the “middle-of-the-road hero” in historical novels; I know of
few historical novels, or novels at all, that create and focus on protagonists
like the Carterets. One more argument for Marrow’s
unique greatness.
Next novel
tomorrow,
Ben
PS. What do you
think? Other nominees for the GAN?
No comments:
Post a Comment