On one of the more emotionally appealing yet
complex and problematic recurring American ideas.
The final magazine article that struck the
AmericanStudier in me is in the “Adventure” section: titled “The Joy of
Tranquility,” the article profiles the
Bradford Camps in Maine’s North
Woods. The lead-in paragraph makes the article’s argument quite clear: “A
rustic camp in Maine that has hardly changed in over a century proves that the
amenities of modern life aren’t, after all, so essential.” For the remainder of
the article, its author, freelance
outdoor and sports journalist Brion O’Connor, moves back and forth between
an account of the camps’ extended history and the story of his own idyllic weekend
on its grounds. As I read the story, I had two interconnected but interestingly
layered responses: I was drawn into the setting and world of O’Connor’s weekend
at the camps; but I was also strongly reminded of one of my favorite American
essays, E.B.
White’s seminal “Once More to the Lake” (unfortunately not available
online, but that’s the first paragraph).
O’Connor’s and White’s essays differ in an
important way (White is describing a return trip with his young son to the lake
where he and his family went for many years when he was young; O’Connor has
never been to the camps before this visit in adulthood), but they also share a
couple of key and definitely appealing features. In each, the author makes a
powerful connection to his familial past through his trip: White, in watching
his son experience the world of the lake, connects to his own father’s
perspective and identity as a result; O’Connor thinks continually of his
maternal grandfather, who loved places like the camps and helped introduce O’Connor
to his outdoorsy interests. Such familial bonds are of course universally
poignant and compelling, and they also connect to an even broader emotion that
the two essays consistently evoke: nostalgia. White does not
ever say quite so explicitly what that opening paragraph of O’Connor’s (or
perhaps his editor’s) argues, about the benefits of escaping the amenities of
modern life; but he does for example note his happiness that a paved highway
has not yet found its way to the lake, among other moments that reveal how much
“rustic” and “hardly changed in over a century” are likewise important
influences in his own perspective.
It’s hard to argue with such nostalgia, not
least because who doesn’t long for something from our childhoods that seems
simpler, easier, slower? But one problem with nostalgia, as with that question
of mine, is that it presupposes that the experience being remembered is indeed
a shared one, to which everyone can connect. And there’s one especially telling
detail in O’Connor’s story: the Bradford Camps are currently owned by “Igor
Sikorsky III, grandson of the helicopter magnate.” O’Connor never mentions how
much a weekend at Bradford costs, but I would guess that, while not
Sikorsky-level necessarily, it’s not too far removed. A trip to White’s unnamed
lake likely wouldn’t cost nearly so much, but it would still require various
luxuries—the time and ability to take off from work; money for the various
supplies that camping requires; a vehicle with which you can drive from your
home to its site—that are far from universally shared by all Americans. Moreover,
it’s fair to ask whether the American narratives that privilege places like the
camps and the lake aren’t themselves based on certain social or communal
categories and identities and what they prioritize or have experienced; and
whether nostalgic embraces of these places as more ideal don’t in fact extend
those prioritizations and explicitly critique other possible places (like
cities). I don’t have any definite answers to these questions, but I’d say they’re
worth remembering, even as we feel the tug of O’Connor’s camps and White’s
lake.
Special post this weekend,
Ben
PS. What do you think? Places you’re
nostalgic about? Takes on such nostalgia?
10/5 Memory Day nominees: A tie between Jonathan
Edwards; and Louise Fitzhugh,
who like Edwards is best known for one
defining work but whose career
is similarly
much more
diverse than that one impressive
but singular text.
No comments:
Post a Comment