My New Book!

My New Book!
My New Book!

Wednesday, December 24, 2025

December 24, 2025: Revisiting My Books: The Chinese Exclusion Act

[Many, many, many times over the last year, I’ve wished that more Americans would have the chance to read my writing and learn even a few of the many lessons I believe it offers for us in 2025. So for my annual Wishes for the Holiday Elves series, I wanted to revisit my six books, highlighting something specific from each that I think we could takeaway today. Leading up to a special post on my awesome wife’s Christmastastic new book!]

Given that the Trump administration has proposed various new policies that amount to a sequel to the Chinese Exclusion Act, I don’t know that I need to make much of a case for rereading my book The Chinese Exclusion Act: What It Can Teach Us about America (2013) here in 2025. I’ve also learned a lot more about that subject in the dozen years since, and would recommend my podcast The Celestials’ Last Game: Baseball, Bigotry, & the Battle for America (2024) for those more up-to-date thoughts. But one section in my third book that I’d say holds up particularly well is the Introduction: Teaching Americans the Chinese Exclusion Act. In that intro I make the case for something that I have come to believe even more strongly over the last dozen years: that public scholarship is a form of teaching, in the best senses of the term and the classroom (conversational, multivocal, civil, rigorous, and more). I’d like to think that both this book overall and the many book talks I had the chance to deliver over the year or so after its publication exemplified that vision of both public scholarship and education, and I’d say that I’ve never expressed it more succinctly than I did in that Introduction.

Next wish tomorrow,

Ben

PS. What do you think? (Also, I have an e-copy of this book that I’m happy to email anyone who’s interested, so lemme know if you’d like one!)

Tuesday, December 23, 2025

December 23, 2025: Revisiting My Books: Redefining American Identity

[Many, many, many times over the last year, I’ve wished that more Americans would have the chance to read my writing and learn even a few of the many lessons I believe it offers for us in 2025. So for my annual Wishes for the Holiday Elves series, I wanted to revisit my six books, highlighting something specific from each that I think we could takeaway today. Leading up to a special post on my awesome wife’s Christmastastic new book!]

Largely because I had started this blog in the meantime, by the time I published my second book, Redefining American Identity: From Cabeza de Vaca to Barack Obama (2011), I was already thinking and working actively on the goal of creating public scholarship. I thus hope and believe that the whole book would be of interest to broad audiences in 2025, and certainly would argue that we all desperately need to engage with the book’s overarching thesis, my vision of cross-cultural transformation as a foundational and shared element of American identity. But the book is focused on individual American identities and stories (as captured in autobiographical works by those individuals), and if I were to highlight just one of them that it would especially important for all Americans to read & remember here in 2025, the answer is a no-brainer: Gloria AnzaldĂșa. AnzaldĂșa is not an easy read (to put it very mildly), but she has so much to tell us about not only the border (although that would be enough, given how much it has become a metonym for so many things America), but also what it really means to be American (in contrast to the simplistic visions we often have). If folks aren’t gonna read my book, they sure should check out Borderlands/La Frontera (1987).

Next wish tomorrow,

Ben

PS. What do you think?

Monday, December 22, 2025

December 22, 2025: Revisiting My Books: Contesting the Past, Reconstructing the Nation

[Many, many, many times over the last year, I’ve wished that more Americans would have the chance to read my writing and learn even a few of the many lessons I believe it offers for us in 2025. So for my annual Wishes for the Holiday Elves series, I wanted to revisit my six books, highlighting something specific from each that I think we could takeaway today. Leading up to a special post on my awesome wife’s Christmastastic new book!]

I won’t lie, I don’t really recognize the Ben who wrote Contesting the Past, Reconstructing the Nation: American Literature & Culture in the Gilded Age, 1876-1893 (2007). Partly that’s because it was published more than 18 years ago, and largely based on a dissertation finished 20 years ago; but mostly it’s because that Ben wasn’t yet thinking about producing public scholarship, and so it’s by far my most “academic” book, in ways that would make it more difficult for it to speak to broad audiences in 2025. But there’s still a lot in it that I love and would want to share with folks, and that’s especially true of the literary works and authors on whom I focused my analyses. Here are just a handful that are part of that project and that we all should be reading in 2025, with links to posts where I’ve written about them:

Helen Hunt Jackson’s Ramona (1884)

William Justin Harsha’s Ploughed Under (1881)

Sarah Winnemucca’s Life Among the Piutes: Their Wrongs and Claims (1886)

George Washington Cable’s The Grandissimes (1881)

And the dialogic poetry of Sarah Piatt

Next wish tomorrow,

Ben

PS. What do you think?

Saturday, December 20, 2025

December 20-21, 2025: Refugee Stories in 2025

[On December 14th, 1950, the United Nations adopted its Statute on the UN High Commissioner for Refugees. So for the 75th anniversary of that important moment, this week I’ve AmericanStudied the UNHCR and other refugee stories, leading up to this weekend post on that fraught and crucial issue in 2025.]

I’m a couple weeks out from my annual Year in Review series, so watch this space for more extended reflections on what dominated the headlines in 2025; but it’s fair to say that no social or political issue did so more consistently than did the Trump administration’s capricious, cruel, and thoroughly unconstitutional treatment of refugees, asylum seekers, and every other form of immigrant arrival to the U.S. For me those stories weren’t just headlines, though: I saw them up close, through the ongoing experiences of an FSU first-year student and her family. They’re refugees from Venezuela who had been granted Temporary Protected Status, and over the course of just a few months they had that status ripped away by the administration, had a court re-grant it, had it taken away again, and continued to live with profound uncertainty about their immediate and long-term future. The student is one of the strongest I’ve taught in many years, and wrote an excellent final research paper for our first-year writing course on these issues and their many contemporary and historical contexts; she’d be a wonderful addition to any university and community. But in truth, while that fact offers a particularly striking contrast with Trump’s thoroughly awful identity, what’s happened and continues to happen to her and her family shouldn’t happen to anyone, anywhere, at any time. I don’t know that I need to say any more about refugee stories in 2025 than that.

Holiday series starts Monday,

Ben

PS. What do you think?

Friday, December 19, 2025

December 19, 2025: Refugee Stories: Refugees in 2020 (and Today)

[On December 14th, 1950, the United Nations adopted its Statute on the UN High Commissioner for Refugees. So for the 75th anniversary of that important moment, this week I’ll AmericanStudy the UNHCR and other refugee stories, leading up to a weekend post on that fraught and crucial issue in 2025.]

[Note: I originally shared this post as part of my 2020 Year in Review blog series, but once again it feels even more timely here in late 2025.]

On a short story that helps cut to the heart of an ongoing horror.

It was almost impossible, in the final months of 2020, to pay attention to all of the important news stories that broke; not that that was in any way a new problem, but I nonetheless felt that constant struggle for focus to be amplified as we all tried simply to navigate the conclusions of the Fall semester, of the multi-month crisis of democracy following the 2020 presidential election, of the end of a very, very long year. So it’s fair to say that a couple of late 2020 stories about the ongoing human rights abuses of migrant and refugee families and children at the US/Mexico border—a story about how the federal government had purposefully made it much harder to reunite separated families (illegal actions that reek of Stephen Miller’s xenophobic touch), and a related one about just how much children remain separated from their parents long after that policy was supposed to have ended—largely flew under the radar for far too many of us (this AmericanStudier very much included).

The frustrating absence of such stories from much of our collective consciousness isn’t simply about information overload, however. Precisely because the government has kept these individuals and families so isolated and separated, so hidden from even those tasked with helping them (much less our society as a whole), it can be quite difficult (speaking for myself, at least) to get to the human heart of what is happening to these people, of the intimate realities of the detention process and centers, of all that has been done and is still being done to these fellow humans and Americans (for that they are, despite our government’s and system’s most xenophobic and destructive attempts to define them otherwise). There certainly has been excellent investigative journalism despite those imposed limits—I would point for example to this stunning late August piece from Carmen Molina Acosta, an editorial intern with the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (ICIJ) who clearly has a very bright future in journalism, on the horrors of COVID in the detention centers—but there we’re back to the information overload challenge.

Such journalistic pieces are still entirely worth reading and sharing, to be clear. But I also believe that cultural works have a role in play in cutting through the noise and helping us understand and empathize with the human experiences of these migrants and refugees. As part of my two online Short Story sections this Fall, I taught one stunning such cultural work: Cristina Henriquez’s “Everything Is Far from Here” (2017). Henriquez’s short story stays solely and fully within the perspective of her main character, a refugee woman and mother experiencing individual versions of detention and separation from her young son; readers get only the briefest glimpses of the broader social and political contexts for those experiences, both in the US and in her Latin American country of origin. But that’s precisely the vital strength of short stories—using literary elements like narration and perspective, descriptions and imagery, dialogue and free indirect discourse (the intimate representation of a character’s inner thoughts, a really powerful literary concept and effect despite the overly theoretical name) to locate readers within such an experience and world. If I could ask all Americans to read one text about the ongoing border horrors, I think I’d go with this simple, brutal, vital short story.

Contemporary connections this weekend,

Ben

PS. What do you think?

Thursday, December 18, 2025

December 18, 2025: Refugee Stories: Tina Powell’s Guest Post

[On December 14th, 1950, the United Nations adopted its Statute on the UN High Commissioner for Refugees. So for the 75th anniversary of that important moment, this week I’ll AmericanStudy the UNHCR and other refugee stories, leading up to a weekend post on that fraught and crucial issue in 2025.]

I couldn’t share a weeklong series on refugee stories without linking to this great September 2018 Guest Post from Tina Powell on refugee literature, contexts and histories, and more. Check it out, please!

Last story tomorrow,

Ben

PS. What do you think?

Wednesday, December 17, 2025

December 17, 2025: Refugee Stories: The Marielitos

[On December 14th, 1950, the United Nations adopted its Statute on the UN High Commissioner for Refugees. So for the 75th anniversary of that important moment, this week I’ll AmericanStudy the UNHCR and other refugee stories, leading up to a weekend post on that fraught and crucial issue in 2025.]

[Note: This post was originally from 2019, but let’s just say it hasn’t gotten less relevant in the six years since.]

Three ways to contextualize and analyze the 1980 exodus of some 125,000 Cubans (known as Marielitos) from Mariel Harbor to the United States.

1)      Refugee policy: Donald Trump’s Executive Orders on refugees and immigration have of course brought debates over refugee policy back into the news, but in a particularly oversimplified—and fearful and paranoid and factually challenged—way. The situation and issues facing President Jimmy Carter in 1980, on the other hand, illustrate just how complex and multi-layered national decisions about refugee policy are (even for those of us, like me and I believe Carter, who feel strongly that the U.S. should always try to welcome refugees). There are the perspectives and realities of a sovereign nation like Cuba, and of our own evolving relationship with that nation (Carter and Castro had worked to alleviate some tensions between the two nations over the years leading up to Mariel). There are the humanitarian and practical questions of where and how the refugees will be resettled in the United States, and what that will mean for the communities to which they arrive (Miami was most definitely and profoundly changed by the Marielitos). And there are the thorny but inevitable comparative questions—what do our decisions in response to this particular refugee community mean for the millions of others seeking and waiting for the chance to asylum? All difficult issues, and all raised with clarity by the Mariel boatlift.

2)      The boatlift in art: Refugee and immigration histories aren’t just about governments and policies, though—they’re also and most importantly about communities and stories, about identities and lives. Artistic and cultural texts are particularly good at portraying those latter sides to histories, and I would highlight three very distinct such texts about the Mariel boatlift. The Brian De Palma film Scarface (1983) uses the story of one fictional Marielito, Tony Montana (Al Pacino in one of his most famous performances), to consider some of our most overarching national narratives, from the ideals of the American Dream to the most sordid nightmares of violence and crime. Christine Bell’s novel The PĂ©rez Family (1991; adapted into a 1995 film) focuses more fully on themes of community, both among the Marielitos (the protagonists are characters who share the same last name and decide to pass as a family) and in relationship to the Cuban-American community (Juan PĂ©rez is looking for his wife, who has already been in the United States for decades by the time he arrives). And Reinaldo Arenas’ autobiography Before Night Falls (1992; adapted into a 2000 film) tells the harrowing story of one individual writer before, during, and after the boatlift. Each text is different in medium and genre as well as story and theme, but taken together they offer a powerful artistic portrayal of the boatlift.

3)      Pedro Zamora: For better or for worse, the fictional gangster Tony Montana is probably the most famous individual Marielito. But I believe a close second would be Pedro Zamora, who came to the United States with his family in the boatlift when he was only 8 years old, and came to prominence 14 years later as the breakout star of The Real World: San Francisco, the 1994 third season of MTV’s ground-breaking reality TV show. Zamora broke multiple cultural barriers during his time on television: he was one of the first openly gay stars of a TV show, and his commitment ceremony with boyfriend Sean Sasser the first such same-sex ceremony in TV history; and he was also living with HIV/AIDS throughout the show, bringing a profoundly intimate and human face to a disease that was, at the time, still deeply controversial and feared. Zamora’s tragic death later that year, and his widely broadcast memorial service, offered one more level to that prominence and its effects. None of those events or effects are limited to Marielitos or Cuban Americans, of course; but we can’t understand and analyze Zamora’s identity, nor perhaps appreciate his commitment to public advocacy and activism, without remembering the foundational role of the Mariel boatlift in his life.

Next story tomorrow,

Ben

PS. What do you think?