[September 25th marks William Faulkner’s 125th birthday. So this week I’ll AmericanStudy Faulkner and other Southern storytellers, leading up to a special weekend tribute to a great new Faulkner website!]
On the
complex generational relationship that helps explain the Southern Renaissance.
It’s easy
enough, and certainly not inaccurate, to characterize the group of Southern
intellectuals and writers who formed the vanguard of the 1920s
and 30s Southern Renaissance as profoundly conservative, as a community rebelling
against radical and future-driven national and international movements and
trends such as modernism, urbanization, and (eventually) the New Deal. This was
the group, after all, who called themselves first the Fugitives and then the Agrarians, and
whose collective
writings culminated in the unquestionably conservative (and at
times unfortunately
racist) manifesto I’ll Take
My Stand (1930). No AmericanStudiers worthy of the name could fail to take
such historical and cultural contexts into consideration when analyzing why
these young men (mostly) and women came together
at this moment, and why they wrote and thought the things they did.
Yet there
are of course other kinds of contexts that also inform any and every writer’s
(and person’s) identity, perspective, and works, and I believe a biographical
one is particularly important when it comes to analyzing the Southern
Renaissance figures. They were born around the turn of the 20th
century, which meant that their parents had been born, in most cases, just
after the end of the Civil War; those parents were thus the children of both
Civil War veterans and of the incredibly complex and fraught post-war period,
the children of (among other things) both the Lost
Cause and the New South. To take the Renaissance’s most enduring
literary figure, for example: William
Faulkner was born in 1897, to parents born in 1870 and 1871; his father
Murry both tried to build the family’s railroad company and to carry on the
legacy of his own
grandfather, a writer and Civil War hero known as “The Old Colonel.” Is it any
wonder, then, that young
Quentin Compson is so obsessed with the voice and perspective of his father, Jason
Compson, and of the familial and Southern pasts about which he learns from
Jason?
If we move
beyond Faulkner, and into the works of the Fugitive and Agrarian writers who
even more overtly self-identified as part of the Renaissance, we likewise find
works and characters centered on—obsessed with, even—the legacies of their
fathers. Perhaps no work better exemplifies that trend than Allen Tate’s
historical and autobiographical novel The Fathers (1938), a text that engages in every tortured
word with the legacies of the Civil War and its aftermath and of the familial
and cultural issues raised therein. Far more ambiguous and complex, but perhaps
even more telling of this father-centered trend, is Robert
Penn Warren’s poem “Mortmain” (1960), a five-section elegy for Warren’s
father; the first section is entitled “After Night Flight Son Reaches
Bedside of Already Unconscious Father, Whose Right Hand Lifts in a Spasmodic
Gesture, as Though Trying to Make Contact: 1955,” and while the subsequent four
sections range far beyond that man and moment, they do so precisely to ground
many other historical and cultural questions in that profoundly
autobiographical starting point. As
Warren’s life and career illustrate, the Southern Renaissance figures were
not circumscribed by such generational relationships—but they were certainly
influenced, and in many ways defined, by them.
Next
storytelling studying tomorrow,
Ben
PS. What
do you think? Southern storytellers you’d share?
No comments:
Post a Comment