[September 24th is F. Scott Fitzgerald’s 125th birthday! So in honor of that quintessential Modernist author, this week I’ll AmericanStudy him and a handful of other exemplary such writers. Share your thoughts on any of them, and any other Modernist authors and texts you’d highlight, for an experimental crowd-sourced weekend post!]
On two strikingly
parallel yet also importantly distinct 1930s to ‘50s Modernist arcs.
Despite our longstanding
collective national antagonism toward communism, one that precedes the Cold War
but of course was greatly amplified during that half-century of global
conflict, there have nonetheless been both moments and communities in which the
political philosophy has had substantially broader and deeper appeal. In the 1930s,
two such factors came together to help produce a sizeable and vocal cohort
of Modernist American writers and intellectuals who embraced communism: the
Depression’s heightening of wealth inequalities and social stratification
seemed to highlight the limitations and even destructive capabilities of unchecked
capitalism; and those economic woes, coupled with the continued destructive
forces of segregation, lynching, and other communal ills and threats, led many
African Americans similarly to seek an alternative to the dominant American
systems.
Those responses
happened within multiple communities, but they can be succinctly illustrated by
two individuals, Modernist writers whose most significant novels bookend the
1930s in American literature and culture. John Dos Passos had been publishing
fiction since the mid-1920s, but it was the trilogy that came to be collected
as U.S.A. (1938)—The 42nd Parallel (1930), 1919 (1932), and The Big Money (1936)—that exemplified both his
stylistic experimentation and his socialistic philosophies. Richard Wright
launched his career with the short story collection Uncle
Tom’s Children (1938) but truly entered the literary stratosphere two
years later with Native
Son (1940), a novel that features both one of American literature’s
most eloquent defenders of communism (in the lawyer Max) and a character
(protagonist Bigger Thomas) whose tragic and brutal arc makes numerous,
ineloquent but compelling arguments for the philosophy.
In the 1940s to
50s, both writers famously broke with those philosophies and with the Communist
Party: Wright in one pivotal moment, the essay “I Tried to Be a
Communist” (1944); and Dos Passos more gradually, in a series of public
statements and positions that culminated in his qualified support
for Joseph McCarthy (among other turning points). Yet I would also argue
that their shifts represent two quite distinct personal and national narratives
in the post-Modernist era: Dos Passos genuinely seemed, in response to World
War II, the Cold War, and other factors, to change in his political and social
perspectives; whereas to my mind Wright’s perspectives remained largely
unchanged, and he came instead to see, as does for example Ralph
Ellison’s Invisible Man, the
Communist Party as an imperfect and indeed failed vehicle through which to seek
such political and social change. Such a distinction would of course become
even more important in the 1960s, when a new
generation of African American activists found anew a compelling
alternative in American socialism.
Fitzgerald post
tomorrow,
Ben
PS. What do you
think? Thoughts on these authors and texts, or any other Modernist ones, for
the weekend post?
No comments:
Post a Comment