On the story that
shows just how much sixty minutes can include.
I’ve already
written in this space about two Kate Chopin works, both of which are pretty
short and pack a hell of a punch in their own right: the controversial and
unpublished (in her lifetime) short story “The
Storm” (1898) and her masterpiece of a novel
The Awakening (1899). But to my
mind, there’s not an American short story that does more with less—less time
passing within the story, less space (both in terms of setting within the story
and space on the page), fewer words—than Chopin’s “The Story of an Hour”
(1894). My central goal for this week’s series is that I share these stories
and get your takes, so I’ll say first and foremost, for each story and post:
Check out the story at that link, and come back here and share your thoughts!
Okay, welcome
back! I don’t want to say too much about my own take, because I am genuinely
more interested in hearing yours. But I will try to say at least one thing for
each story, highlighting one of the many reasons why I think they’re worth our
(amazingly brief) time and (nonetheless far deeper) engagement. For Chopin’s
story, I think perhaps the most impressive thing is this: the story centers on
the perspective of its main character, Louise Mallard, and manages to convey so
much about her perspective and identity in such a brief space; yet at the same
time, I would argue that Chopin likewise includes multiple other perspectives
on Louise, from those of at least three other characters (her sister Josephine,
her husband’s friend Richards, and her husband Brently) to that of the
sympathetic but also observing outside narrator. The Awakening is often described (and
I agree) as a model creation of complex narration and perspectives—but
“Story” manages to do the same, and in less than twenty paragraphs.
So what do you
think? This paragraph for rent!
Next short short
tomorrow,
Ben
PS. Thoughts on
this story, or others you’d share?
Well, since you already wrote about my favorite, one that I've taught quite often and of which I never tire, I'll go instead with Margaret Atwood's "Happy Endings." Warning: It's not at all happy. In fact, I find it much more depressing than "Story of an Hour." Then again, I also find it much more realistic.
ReplyDeletehttp://web.ics.purdue.edu/~rebeccal/lit/238f11/pdfs/HappyEndings_Atwood.pdf
-Kate
Thanks for sharing that one, Kate! Definitely depressing, but also funny and smart and complex and, well, Atwoodian.
ReplyDelete