On a novel with over-the-top moments that practically scream “loss of
innocence,” and the quieter scene that much more potently captures it.
To follow up the main idea from yesterday’s post, I experienced a very
different kind of teenage literary loss of innocence when I decided to read
Philip Roth’s Portnoy’s
Complaint (1969) for pleasure in early high school (what can I say, I
was a nerd and the son of an English professor to boot). I can still quite
distinctly remember arriving at Chapter 2, “Whacking Off,” and encountering for
the first time just exactly how far Roth is willing to go—how obscene, how
graphic, how flagrantly over-the-top. For reasons not quite known to me, in my
second semester at Fitchburg State I chose to put Portnoy on the syllabus of a junior-level seminar on “Major
American Authors of the 20th Century,” and got to see 25 undergrads—24
women, by chance—having their own such encounters with Roth, the novel, and
that chapter in particular. Let’s just say it wasn’t just me.
Roth’s late masterpiece American
Pastoral (1997) is a far more realistic and restrained work than Portnoy, but nonetheless Roth includes a
couple of distinctly Roth-ian over-the-top scenes, both symbolizing quite
overtly his novel’s overall themes of the
loss of innocence that accompanied the late 60s and early 70s in American
culture and society. In the first, the novel’s now middle-aged protagonist,
Swede Levov, meets with a seemingly innocent young women to try to learn the
whereabouts of his missing daughter Merry; the woman turns out instead to be a brazen
and cynical 60s radical, and she meets the Swede naked, graphically exposing
and probing herself in front of him (while daring him to, in essence, rape her).
In the second, the tour-de-force set piece with which Roth concludes the novel,
a family dinner full of shocking revelations and betrayals is set against the
backdrop of the televised Watergate hearings, and culminates with a crazy
drunken woman stabbing an elderly man in the head with her fork.
These scenes are as surprising and shocking as intended, and I suppose in
that way they make Roth’s point. But if he intends the theme of the loss of
innocence to be tragic as well as disturbing and comic (which those two scenes
are, respectively), then I would point a far quieter and to my mind far more
potent scene. In it, the Swede finally finds Merry and sees her again, for the
only time between her teenage disappearance (after she bombs a local post
office in political protest and kills an innocent bystander) and his own later
death. He asks a few questions, but mostly what he does is listen (to her
stories of all the horrors she has experienced in the years since the bombing)
and observe (her literally fading life as a converted Jainist,
one for whom any contact with the world is destructive and so self-deprivation
and -starvation comprises the only meaningful future). As a parent, I can
imagine nothing more shattering hearing and seeing such things from one of my
children—and in the Swede’s quiet horror and sadness, Roth captures a far more
powerful and chilling loss of innocence.
Next fall tomorrow,
Ben
PS. What do you think? Images of fall, or The Fall, you’d share?
No comments:
Post a Comment