[250 years ago this week, Rhode Island banned the slave trade. That significant moment was just one of many in this littlest state’s story, so this week I’ll AmericanStudy a handful of Ocean State histories, leading up to a special post on works through which you can learn more about Rhode Island!]
On two
significant layers to Rhode Island’s groundbreaking
1774 Act.
I wrote at
length about the history of the slave trade and slavery more broadly in Rhode
Island for this
Saturday Evening Post Considering
History column, so in lieu of a full first paragraph I’ll ask you to check
out that column and then come on back for further thoughts.
Welcome
back! I’ve written a good bit over
the years, here and elsewhere,
in relationship to various
contexts, about how and why we need to better remember that slavery existed
throughout the colonies at the time
of the Revolution. While that was true for every New England colony, it was
doubly true for Rhode Island given Bristol’s central role in the slave trade (a
principal subject of that Post
column). Which makes it that much more important and impressive that it was
Rhode Island which became the first colony to ban the slave trade, and which just
as importantly did so, as this
article on the 1774 Act notes by quoting a
Journal of the American Revolution
article from historian Christian McBurney, by “addressing the evils and
inconsistencies of slavery as a whole, and not just the slave trade.” Given
that fifteen years later the U.S. Constitution itself would only address
the slave trade, and not slavery as a whole, Rhode Island here really
modeled a far more sweeping and inclusive vision of community.
There were
various factors which contributed to that moment and model, but certainly a
central one was the colony’s large
Quaker community. The most direct predecessor to the 1774 Act was a 1772
formal denunciation of slavery by the Rhode Island Society of Friends, a
denunciation co-authored by colonial leader Stephen Hopkins (who would also
draft the Preamble to the 1774 Act). And just a few months, Hopkins an authored
an even more impassioned attack on slavery in a
document freeing his own enslaved person Saint Jago, writing that “keeping any
of his rational Creatures in Bondage, who are capable of taking care of, and
providing for themselves in a State of Freedom, is altogether inconsistent with
his Holy and Righteous Will.” Hopkins would go on to sign the Declaration of
Independence on behalf of Rhode Island, reminding us that while
slaveholding was frustratingly part of the identities of too many American
Framers, opposition to slavery was likewise part of the Revolutionary moment,
and nowhere more potently than in Rhode Island.
Last Rhode
Island history tomorrow,
Ben
PS. What
do you think? Other Ocean State stories you’d highlight?
No comments:
Post a Comment