[Later this month I start teaching a new online class, a variation of my Ethnic American Lit course that will focus on representations of work in American literature. So this week I’ll AmericanStudy a handful of such representations, leading up to a special weekend post on some of my favorite pop culture worker-characters!]
On a short story
that combines local color and sentimental fiction—and becomes much more.
I’ve written two
posts about one of my favorite 19th century authors, Elizabeth
Stuart Phelps: this
one on the overall arc and significance of her multi-faceted literary
career; and this
one on her best novel, the feminist, realist, and powerfully affecting The Story of Avis (1877). Throughout
her career, Phelps wed sentimental writing (as in her spiritual Gates trilogy) to local color fiction
(as in the New England regionalism of Avis),
focusing consistently on the experiences of women within those different frames
and settings; she also published a number of young adult and juvenile works,
including the very popular
Gypsy Brenton books (published when she was only in her early 20s). In the
course of that long and successful career, she became one of the century’s
best-selling novelists, inspired prominent subsequent writers like William Dean
Howells, Sarah Orne Jewett, and Edith Wharton, and deserves to be far better
remembered and more widely read in our own era.
Yet with all of
that said, it’s quite possible that Phelps’ most interesting and important
piece of writing was her first published work of fiction for adults: “The Tenth of
January,” a short story published in the Atlantic Monthly’s March 1868 volume (when Phelps was only
twenty-three years old). “Tenth” fictionalizes one of the worst industrial and
workplace disasters in American history, the January 10th, 1860 collapse
of the Pemberton Mill in Lawrence, Massachusetts. That famous and horrific
historical event offered Phelps a perfect chance to combine her two most
consistent literary genres in this debut short story, and she does so to great
success—opening with an extended portrayal of this Massachusetts mill town and
its unique culture and community (“it would be difficult to find Lawrence’s
equal,” the narrator notes), and then gradually building a sentimental and
highly emotional story about a particular young female worker (nearly all those
killed in the collapse fit that description, with most of them recent
immigrants), Del Ivory, whose tragic fate (along with those of many other
characters, some only children) becomes intertwined with that of the mill.
Those elements
alone, in the hands of a master like Phelps, would be enough to create a
compelling and moving story out of this striking historical material. But in
the voice of her narrator, at once a detached observer and a fiery critic,
Phelps adds another complex and vital layer to her story. Consider these back to
back moments in the story’s introductory section. First the narrator concludes
a descriptive paragraph on Lawrence with these angry lines, “Of these ten
thousand [workers] two thirds are girls: voluntary captives, indeed; but what
is the practical difference? It is an old story—that of going to jail for want
of bread.” And then she transitions into the body of her story with this
elegiac paragraph: “My story is written as one sets a bit of marble to mark a
mound. I linger over it as we linger beside the grave of one who sleeps well:
half sadly, half gladly—more gladly than sadly—but hushed.” This narrative
voice is not unlike that of another Atlantic
Monthly story from earlier in the decade, Rebecca
Harding Davis’ “Life in the Iron Mills” (1861)—but by wedding this engaging
narrator and her multi-faceted literary genres to a real and horrific
historical event, Phelps add yet another layer of power and pathos to this
unique short story.
Next literary
work tomorrow,
Ben
PS. What do you
think? Other representations of work you’d share?
No comments:
Post a Comment