[On July 6th,
1963, President John F. Kennedy’s
Executive Order establishing the Presidential Medal of Freedom
went into effect. So this week I’ve AmericanStudied a handful of the Medals
recipients, leading up to this weekend post on the most recent, most
controversial honoree yet.]
On the more
obvious and more subtle ways that the most recent recognition broke tradition.
Presidential
Medals of Freedom have certainly been awarded to overtly political figures
before, including former President Lyndon Johnson and presidential candidate
Hubert Humphrey (both honored by Jimmy Carter in 1980), presidential candidate
Barry Goldwater (by Ronald Reagan in 1986), future Vice President Dick Cheney
(by George H.W. Bush in 1991), former President Ronald Reagan (by Bush in 1993),
former President George H.W. Bush (by Barack Obama in 2011), former President Bill
Clinton (by Obama in 2013), and Vice President Joe Biden (by Obama in 2017). Indeed,
there have been enough of those kinds of political recipients (often
understandably tied to the presidency and presidential administrations) that
they really constitute their own category alongside the others about which I’ve
written this week (although it’s worth noting that such political honorees were
not present in the first couple decades of medals and have emerged as a
category in the last forty years). So it would be inaccurate to argue that President Trump’s awarding
of a Presidential Medal of Freedom during his February 2020 State of the
Union Address to conservative talk show host Rush Limbaugh in and of itself
comprised something new or different.
But Limbaugh’s
medal did still break from tradition in a couple troubling ways. For one thing,
prior Presidential Medals for media figures had gone to journalists whose work
and voices were intended for and benefited all Americans: from Edward
R. Murrow in 1964 to Norman
Rockwell in 1977 to Walter
Cronkite in 1981 to Clare
Boothe Luce in 1983. The one partial exception to that trend was George
H.W. Bush’s medal for National
Review founder William F. Buckley
in 1991; but whether we agree with this designation or not (and I mostly
don’t), Buckley was seen at the time, as
he still largely is, as a more serious and mainstream figure than Limbaugh.
And when it comes to symbolic statements like presidential medals, such
perceptions and narratives matter a great deal; that is, while Buckley’s role
and status might be debatable, there is no doubt whatsoever that Rush
Limbaugh is a far-right pundit, one who defines his journalistic purpose as
advancing that position and (most of all) defeating his perceived adversaries
at all costs (including, if not especially, with smears
and lies). To recognize someone like that with a Presidential Medal of
Freedom is to politicize and polemicize this national honor as fully as Trump
has every other aspect of the presidency.
Limbaugh’s was
also the first Presidential Medal of Freedom, out of the hundreds that have
been awarded, to be presented at a State of the Union Address. That might seem
like a very insignificant change, and it is important not to be swayed by the
idea of tradition for its own sake; where and how a medal is presented shouldn’t
necessarily be beholden to the past. In this case it is impossible to separate
my prior point from this one; that is, Trump honoring this especially partisan
and problematic figure is entirely tied to his concurrent treatment of the State
of the Union as an occasion for demagoguery of which Limbaugh would undoubtedly
be proud. But even if this State of the Union medal had been presented to a
more universally beloved figure (like Elvis Presley, one of Trump’s first
recipients as I mentioned yesterday), awarding it in that context would still
mean turning this highest civilian honor into a reality show moment, and thus
making it wholly about the moment (and the president awarding it), rather than
the honored figure. That’s a symbolic issue—but when it comes to one of our
most prominent national symbolic customs, such issues become very meaningful
indeed.
Next series
starts Monday,
Ben
PS. What do you
think? Other honorees you’d highlight?
No comments:
Post a Comment