[Another entry
in my biannual
series on interesting and impressive new
releases in AmericanStudies. Add your favorite works, new or old, in
comments for a crowd-sourced weekend reading list!]
On a book that helps
us understand a complex, crucial Early Republic question.
First, I’ll ask
you to check out this
long-ago post of mine, on the complex question of whether we progressive AmericanStudiers
can and should support more noble nullification efforts (such as Thomas
Jefferson’s resistance to the Alien and Sedition Acts or William
Apess’s arguments in favor of the Mashpee Revolt) and yet oppose more
ignoble ones (such as John C. Calhoun’s
South Carolina nullification fight) without hypocrisy. Of course I believe that
specific contexts matter, and that absolutist perspectives very rarely make
sense; but on the other hand, in all three of these cases the arguments were in
favor of states or communities having the ability to resist and even nullify
federal laws and thus the Constitution itself, and that is, to say the least, a
slippery and dangerous slope that seems to end quite clearly at secession.
However we answer those vexed
questions, the overarching takeaway from all those histories is that the
Constitution, like America itself, remained an entirely living and evolving
entity throughout the Early Republic period (and still does to this day, but I’d
say that it was even more fragile and in-progress in that post-Revolution era).
In his impressive Fugitive
Slaves and the Unfinished American Revolution: Eight Cases, 1848-1856
(McFarland, 2013), Professor Gordon
S. Barker goes one step further, arguing that the Revolution itself was
still unfolding through such national and Constitutional crises. Beginning and
ending with two of the most famous fugitive slave cases (William
and Ellen Craft, whose racial and gender passing was just as revolutionary
as their legal status; and Margaret Garner,
whose choice of infanticide became the starting
point for multiple cultural works including Toni Morrison’s Beloved), Barker moves through eight
such historical moments, arguing for what each contributed to these evolving
debates over law, justice, and America.
I’m not going to summarize or
paraphrase Barker’s arguments—as with every post in this week’s series, one of
my main points is that, to quote LeVar Burton’s magnum opus, if you want to
know the rest, read the book! Instead, I’ll end by connecting these arguments
to one of my favorite Americans, Quock
Walker, the Massachusetts slave whose petitions, along
with those of
fellow slaves—and all based directly on the language and ideas of the
Declaration and Revolution—contributed significantly to that state’s
Revolutionary-era abolition of slavery. Edmund Morgan’s magisterial book American
Slavery, American Freedom argues that the founding of America was
inextricably tied to, and even required the existence of, the system of slavery—but
what Walker and all of Barker’s cases (and his impressive analysis of them) illustrate
is how much debates over that system helped shape and reshape our national
identity and ideas, in the Revolutionary moment and long after.
Next new book
tomorrow,
Ben
PS. What
AmericanStudies books would you recommend?
No comments:
Post a Comment