[Last year, I
followed the Valentine’s series with a complementary
series analyzing some of the things that just don’t quite do it for me. It
was pretty popular, including my biggest
crowd-sourced post to date, so this year I repeated the series—as well as
the request for your non-favorites for a crowd-sourced post. Here it is—and
there’s plenty of room for more grievance-airing in comments!]
Following up Monday’s
Breaking Bad post, Katharine Slater Tweets that “that
tension between approval and critique you’ve identified definitely informs my
own (non-)enjoyment of anti-hero narratives.”
Joe Bastian also
left an
extended comment on Monday’s post, detailing an alternative way to watch
and analyze Breaking Bad.
That post also
prompted an extended
Facebook thread on non-favorite TV shows, featuring thoughts from Nancy
Caronia, Craig Reid, and DeMisty
Bellinger-Delfeld among others.
Responding to Friday’s
post on historical figures, Liz Covart highlights, “Benedict
Arnold. I admire and dislike him.”
Michael Miles agrees with me
on Rutherford B. Hayes.
Jason Herbert agrees with
me on Andrew Jackson, and adds “Frederick
Jackson Turner. Because if I have to read that Frontier Thesis one more
time I’m going to go crazy.”
Maggi
Smith-Dalton recounts that “a man yelled at me once when I mentioned my
dislike of TR at a program we were giving.”
Andrea
Grenadier agrees with Wednesday’s
post on Emerson, writing, “In studying American philosophy, I found myself
constantly exasperated by Emerson, his inconsistencies, and his general
Emerson-ness.”
Other
non-favorites:
Osvaldo Oyola writes that,
“As an undergrad I once scandalized a prof by suggesting that Henry
James needed a better editor, and that it could be me.”
Jonathan Menon highlights, “Political
corruption. Corrupt through and through. Money, money. Special interests,
special interests. It’s outrageous.”
Irene
Martyniuk writes, “I
really dislike fan fiction. I’m on the side of Julian Barnes, who wrote in
his rather smart Flaubert’s
Parrot,
‘knit your own stuff.’ Yeah, the title of the book is part of the
post-modern joke, but there it is. Of course, the magic of a book is that
we fall in love with complex and interesting characters and want a book to keep
going. A truly wonderful book is the one that leaves you bereft when it’s
over because you must leave that world. But to my mind, leave you
must. If you are a creator, and that includes a writer, do the hard work
and create your own world—one that other readers will sadly leave at the end of
your text. Hmm, on the British
side—I hate D.H. Lawrence. Too much patriarchal symbolic sex. Over
and over—even turtle sex. No style, just sex. Sigh.”
Next series
starts Monday,
Ben
PS. Any other
non-favorites you want to share? Don’t keep ‘em in, that’s bad for your blood
pressure!
PPS. In comments on Friday's post, NTodd Pritsky nominates Robert E. Lee, and Xan Avalon seconds my Forrest pick and nominates Dan Sickles as well.
ReplyDeleteI was busy editing this week (one of the jobs was, I kid you not, a German marathoner's memoirs), but I missed Irene's completely wonderful comment about fan fiction, and agree wholeheartedly! Her mention of "Flaubert's Parrot" reminded me how utterly brilliant that book was. And the point about leaving the world of the book is spot on, especially leaving the characters of their own devices, and getting back to your world. Thinking back, the books that have moved me the most make me wonder how everyone is still getting on, a few years later.
ReplyDelete