On the gap
between appreciation and enjoyment—or inspiration.
I’m not a music or
pop culture historian (though I play on one the intertubes sometimes), but it
seems undeniable to me that Jim
Morrison and The Doors and Kurt Cobain and Nirvana
drastically influenced, and even helped change, their respective eras in
popular music and culture. They did so of course—as any influential figures and
artists do—as part of larger trends, the psychadelic
rock counter-culture for Morrison and the alternative
grunge scene for Cobain. But contextualizing them doesn’t minimize their
individual talents and voices, and again I believe it’s undeniable that both
men, and the groups they spear-headed, stood out within those trends and eras
for their talents and voices. As songwriters, as musicians, and even as poets,
the two demand appreciation for what they accomplished in their too-short
lives, and I gladly give it to them.
I can appreciate
them without enjoying the fruits of their talents, however, and I have to admit
that virtually everything I’ve heard from both The Doors and Nirvana leaves me
cold. That’s partly a simple matter of taste, and so not much worth extended
attention in this space. But I believe that there’s a factor in my lack of
enjoyment of these bands that does connect to broader AmericanStudies
conversations: I find most of their works distinctly pessimistic and cynical,
expressing a kind of nihilistic rejection of and separation from the world that
reminds me of the narrator of Dostoyevsky’s
Notes from Underground. I’m not
necessarily arguing that the world doesn’t deserve such pessimism much of the
time—but to my mind, there’s a very limited point to artistic works and voices
which consistently express that attitude. Or, to connect my first paragraph to
this one, I can respect the artistic talent with which these figures and bands
express those perspectives, but find not only little enjoyment but little
inspiration in their consistent choice to do so.
Moreover, I think
it’s difficult if not impossible to separate Morrison and Cobain’s tragic
deaths from those attitudes toward the world around them. Cobain
actively took his own life while Morrison did not, but it’s hard for me to
see Morrison’s
apparent descent into alcohol and drug abuse (which, despite ambiguities,
certainly seems to have caused his death) as disconnected from his
world-weariness and desire to separate from all that was around him. To be very
clear, I’m not pretending that I know what either man was dealing with, nor
critiquing their choices and lives. But on the other hand, I find the cult
idolization of the two men troubling, not least because it seems that their
deaths, just as much as their attitudes and perspectives in life, have contributed
to that ongoing
mythography. So while we can and should still engage with their lives and
their music, to my mind we must at the same time push back on any sense that
they represented ideals for which we should strive.
Next non-favorite
tomorrow,
Ben
PS. Thoughts on this
non-favorite? Others you’d share for the weekend post?
Cult of Kurt rises from the grave
ReplyDeleteNovember 2 2002
Kurt Cobain’s diary entries, published in The Age today, reveal a man tortured by drug addiction and illness. But his iconic status grows by the day... - The Independent
Dear Ben and fellow bloggers/music fans,
I'm not myself a fan of Kurt. And I'm no music historian, either. However, if I was asked whether Kurt through his work achieved musical/creative "iconic status" in my book, I would also have to say no.
That being said, I'm now finding it interesting - and even fun - to have an opportunity in the blog to learn some things about the man behind the music, anyway.
I think I'm entitled to my opinion - just as others are entitled to theirs.
Keep me posted
Sincerely,
Roland A. Gibson, Jr.
FSU IDIS Major
Thanks for sharing that article and your take, Roland!
ReplyDelete