[On October 26, 1825, the Erie Canal officially opened. So this week, I’ll honor the 200th anniversary of that huge & hugely important project by highlighting a handful of figures connected to it, leading up to a special weekend tribute to my favorite current civil engineer!]
On two
ways to think about a Renaissance American’s contributions to the Canal.
First
things first: I’ve written about the amazing Ely Parker (1828-1895) many times
in this space, including this
January post on the Erie Canal but also this
one on Parker himself, this
brief one begging for a biopic, this
one on Ulysses S. Grant’s friends, and likely others I’m not remembering
right now. I’d love if you could check out those prior posts, and then come on
back for a couple further thoughts on the Canal connections in particular.
Welcome
back! Ely Parker was such a badass Renaissance
dude that he only enrolled at
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (RPI) to study civil engineering when the New York
Supreme Court refused to accept him to the New York bar as he could not gain
U.S. citizenship; all of this, by the way, took place before his 20th
birthday. Despite that professional setback Parker would spend the next couple decades
continuing to fight (alongside the activist white lawyer and future New York
Attorney General John
Martindale) for Seneca land rights, winning a series of important legal
victories in the process. But I also have to believe that the proximity of his
shift to civil engineering makes clear that he likewise thought of that
profession (much like yesterday’s subject Canvass White did) as a way to serve
his local communities, and thus that his appointment as the Erie
Canal’s resident engineer in Rochester was far from a coincidence (that hyperlinked
article makes the same point at great length).
Yet it’s
important to note that that’s not the only way we could link Parker’s canal
work to his Native American community. As I discussed at length in
this post, toward the end of his life Parker both received extensive criticism
from fellow Native Americans on and himself expressed doubts about his work as
(for example) President Grant’s Commissioner of Indian
Affairs. I don’t think for a second that any part of Parker’s career and
life can overshadow his lifelong dedication to his communities, most especially
his tribal one; but at the same time any 19th century Native
American who worked with the federal government was, to put it simply but not
inaccurately, aiding and abetting the enemy. Given what the Erie Canal, like
any mammoth public transportation project, meant for many
local communities, it’s fair to say that Parker’s connection to it represents
another complicated, multilayered side of this fraught, fascinating, foundational
figure.
Last Canal
context tomorrow,
Ben
PS. What
do you think?
No comments:
Post a Comment