[For this
year’s MLK week series, I’ll highlight under-remembered figures, histories,
and stories that can expand our collective memories of the Civil Rights
Movement. Leading up to a special weekend post on 21st century
voices!]
On the Civil Rights
leader who illustrates the possibilities and challenges of intersectionality.
I’ve written a
good deal in this space about the concept of hybridity (often linking it to
my own idea of cross-cultural
transformation, but the two concepts are of course closely tied), and about
the processes of creolization
that have influenced so many American identities and communities. For a time
hybridity was a central frame through which many scholars of identity developed
their ideas, but in recent years it has been supplanted by a somewhat parallel
yet also distinct concept: intersectionality.
As I understand it, intersectionality refers not so much to hybrid combinations
of identities and more to the ways in which different sides of an individual’s identity
(her race/ethnicity, gender, sexual preference, religion, class, and so on) can
both relate to one another and influence her perspective and actions (even when
they seem tied to one particular category). Two individuals about whom I’ve
written in prior MLK week posts, Yuri
Kochiyama and Coretta
Scott King, certainly demonstrated the role intersectionality played in the
Civil Rights Movement; and in an even more striking way, so did King’s colleague
Bayard Rustin.
Rustin’s major
contributions to the Civil Rights Movement itself represented one layer of
intersectionality, as he consistently linked class, work, and labor union
activism to his civil rights initiatives. A member of the Communist Party for
many decades, he was, for one example, the organizer of the 1963
March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom, which prominently featured labor leader and socialist A.
Philip Randolph; a few years later Rustin would himself co-found and direct
the AFL-CIO’s A. Philip Randolph Institute, which
focused on integrating unions and linking the labor movement to African
American communities and issues. Yet it was in response to another layer to his
own identity that Rustin pursued his most unique intersectional activism: a gay
man, he both fought for gay rights (doing so most publicly in the 1980s, before
his death in 1987) and worked
behind the scenes to make the Civil Rights Movement and subsequent racial
activist efforts more tolerant and accepting of gay and lesbian members and
Americans. Along with writer James Baldwin, Rustin was likely the most
prominent African American gay man of the 20th century; and while
Baldwin consistently occupied an iconoclastic position outside of any communal
movement, Rustin fought
for the intersections of his sexual and racial activisms.
Yet an accurate
history of Rustin’s efforts has to include the fact that for many decades, and
certainly throughout the era of the Civil Rights Movement, he lost that battle.
That meant not only that he had to remain far quieter on the gay rights front
than he likely preferred (again, not become a public spokesperson for the movement
until the 80s), but also that he took
on fewer public roles within the Civil Rights Movement as a result (it
seems) of fears that he would be a
controversial or even ineffective leader due to his sexuality (as well as
his overt history with the Communist Party). None of that means that he could
not be in his lifetime an activist for these multiple causes (he certainly
was), nor that fighting for them at different times is necessarily a bad thing
(no one, nor any movement, can fight for every issue at every moment). But it
does remind us that intersectionality isn’t just about the role and influence
of different sides to our identities—it’s also, and perhaps just as
significantly, about the balances and choices we all have to make, as
individuals and as communities. If Bayard Rustin helps us think about those
challenges as well, that’d be just one more layer to his inspiring life and
work.
Next post
tomorrow,
Ben
PS. What do you
think? Civil Rights figures, histories, or stories you’d want to add to our collective
memories?
" as a result (it seems) of fears that he would be a controversial or even ineffective leader"
ReplyDeleteFears based on the FBI"s use of his background in its briefings to the media and political leaders.
Thanks and ugh, Bill.
ReplyDeleteBen