[September 12th
marks the 150th anniversary of the first performance of The Black Crook, generally considered the first stage musical
(although opinions
vary). So this week I’ll AmericanStudy both Crook and other exemplary stage musicals—and will ask you to share
your solos and choruses for a crowd-pleasing weekend post that’s sure to garner
a standing O!]
On two debates
surrounding the historic musical, and one particularly clear legacy.
As with any text
deemed the “first” of its kind, there are significant debates among scholars
and theater historians on the question of whether The
Black Crook (which opened at New
York’s famous Niblo’s Garden on September 12, 1866) was indeed the first “book
musical.” Numerous prior stage productions had included songs and dances, as
illustrated by the popular J.N.
Barker musical melodrama The Indian
Princess (1809) and the even more popular, longstanding
and evolving genre of the “[Uncle] Tom Show.” Moreover, many of Crook’s musical numbers were adaptations
of existing songs, with only a few
newly written for this production. Yet at the same time, Crook was apparently the first stage
production in which such musical numbers were performed by the actors
themselves and interspersed around and throughout the dialogue sections of the
play, both attributes closely associated with the stage musical as it has
existed for these subsequent 150 years. So while, as always, the question of “first”
will likely remain in dispute, Crook
unquestionably represented an important theatrical innovation.
An important and
very controversial one, that is. The musical featured a scantily-clad female
chorus who performed a series of bawdy dances, leading the New
York Herald to note, in a
scathing review, that there may have been “in Sodom and Gomorrah such a theatre
and spectacle on the Broadway of those doomed cities.” Soon after the prominent
New York minister Reverend
Charles Smythe took up the refrain in a public lecture, attacking the
musical and specifically “the immodest dress of the girls, … allowing the form
of the figure to be discernible.” These public condemnations only increased
interest in the musical, of course, and theater
and burlesque historian Robert Allen has so far as to argue that much of
this negative press might have comprised a “covert advertising ploy on behalf
of the theatre management.” As Shakespeare and many others could attest,
attacks on the morals of the theatre were nothing new—but both the era’s rise
of newspapers and mass media and the boundary-pushing nature of the evolving genre known as the burlesque
musical lent Crook and its controversial
content and contexts a new and significant prominence.
All those
factors combined to make Crook a huge
hit, and one that (along with The
Black Domino, a self-proclaimed “musical comedy” that had opened
earlier in 1866 to a briefer but still prominent run) spawned a wealth of stage
musicals in the years that followed. Niblo’s Garden alone ran two more
musicals, The
White Fawn and Barbe-Bleue, as
soon as Crook closed its initial, record-breaking
474-performance run in 1868. But to my mind, Crook’s most overt legacy is in the ways it uses and adapts prior
cultural texts, including both Goethe’s Faust
(among other European
Gothic texts and folk legends) and existing popular songs and music. Many
of the hugely prominent musicals on which this week’s series will focus have
offered similar adaptations of existing material, from West Side Story’s use of Romeo
and Juliet to Rent’s revision of La Bohéme. Indeed, while as I noted
above some historians have argued that its dearth of original material makes Crook less of a contender for the title
of first musical, the genre’s history suggests precisely the opposite—that in
this way among others The Black Crook
at the very least helped originate what the stage musical remains 150 years
later.
Next musical
tomorrow,
Ben
PS. What do you
think? Other musicals you’d highlight and analyze?
PPS. Updating the hyperlink to the New York Library Guide!
PPS. Updating the hyperlink to the New York Library Guide!
No comments:
Post a Comment