On the gap
between what we know and what we do.
In the decades
prior to the Civil War, virtually every Northern (and American) household
contained numerous products made from cotton
and other materials produced by slave labor. We tend, in our narratives of
slavery and the war, to oppose the North and South, but the realities were
significantly different: not only because abolitionism
was a minority opinion even in a place like Boston; but also and even more
saliently because of those economic and material interconnections between the
regions. Those interconnections don’t mean that the North was pro-slavery,
exactly—but they certainly mean that the North cannot be viewed or understood
as separate from the realities of the slave system. Indeed, if anything it
could be argued that the North existed in a state of deep hypocrisy,
benefitting from those realities of slavery without having to confront their dark,
horrific, everyday details.
As I transition
to this post’s main topic, I need to be very clear that I am not equating NFL players with slaves,
nor the league with the plantation system (equations that have occasionally,
and very controversially, been advanced
by players or commentators).
Instead, I’m making a parallel to the state of deep hypocrisy in which most NFL
fans and viewers—communities to which I belong—exist in this early 21st
century moment. The scientific
and medical consensus about what the sport does to those who play it—or at
least what it can do,
and has done far too frequently—has become clearer and clearer, and the tragic
results of those effects more and more overt and undeniable. Yet we still
watch, in record and if anything increasing
numbers—numbers that amplify the profits and successes of the teams, of the
networks that broadcast their games, of the advertisers who flock to them, of
the sport as a whole. All those entities are of course caught up in the web of
hypocrisy as well—but so, again, are we fans and viewers, including this
AmericanStudier for sure.
So what’s the
answer, not for the league or those other entities but for fans and viewers?
One of my favorite current writers and one of the most thoughtful observers of
American culture and society, Ta-Nehisi Coates, has
written extensively about his
own decision to stop watching and supporting the NFL, a decision that would
seem the only way to meaningfully act upon what we now know. My knowledge, and
in most ways my perspective, mirror Coates’ very closely; yet my actions have
not, and I can’t say that I plan to stop watching football games any time soon.
(Although I most definitely would discourage
my sons from playing the sport if they showed an interest.) Which is to
say, I don’t have an answer, not for myself and thus certainly not for anyone
else or our culture more broadly. But at the very least, as I hope this blog
consistently illustrates in relationship to all its different focal points, it’s
pretty important that we think, openly and collectively, about the question.
Next issue
tomorrow,
Ben
PS. What do you
think?
Cf. this recent NYT story:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.nytimes.com/2014/01/27/sports/football/for-a-cowboys-star-with-dementia-time-is-running-out.html?ref=sports&_r=1
It's funny that you mention this. Today I met a new group of students, and many play football. They asked if I would let my children (presumably they meant sons) play football and were shocked when I said "sure, over my dead body."
ReplyDeleteWhat is truly alarming about the NFL's stance on player health is their blatant disregard for medical statistics proving the destructive nature of repetitive head injury, but the over-all lack of concern of the players in general. I had watched a brilliant documentary on ESPN's 30 for 30 "Broke" in which I learned of the lack of financial preparation these men get. Granted, I guess it's inappropriate of me to assume that the NFL would care about their players, and even less what they would do with their incomes, but these young men, who give away their health and mental stability only to find that their money is practically gone by the time they retire just seems heartbreaking.
And we should get rid of the college "farm system" and replace it with a minor league run by colleges in which the athletes can take classes if they want but are not obligated to be students. Don't get me wrong, I love that this is an opportunity for people who would normally not get a college/uni education, but to be honest... they aren't.
okay, and one last thing, let's sack Carthage!
Thanks for these thoughts! I agree that there are many parts of the system that need significant revision, at each level--and unfortunately, as long as we (and I'm included for sure) keep watching, those things are far less likely to change. Le sigh.
ReplyDeletekeep up the good work, pepe l'pew! (because you said "le sigh")
Delete