On how AmericanStudying can help us understand the importance of responding
to the dominant narratives about our current fiscal bogeyman.
I’m deeply sympathetic to those who argue that the national debt is
significantly less of a problem, particularly in a time of economic downturn,
than our current narratives indicate. Besides my own perspective, that opinion
is shared by multiple voices I trust in our current political and social
climate: smart and rational bloggers like
Digby and David
Atkins; influential and brilliant economists like Paul
Krugman and Robert
Reich; and even the
American Studies Association, whose 2013 annual conference’s main theme will
focus on ways to move “Beyond the Logic of Debt.” Again, I share that
perspective in many ways—but as someone with a strong interest in the history
of national narratives, I have to admit that I’m pretty uneasy about deploying
a narrative that was expressed most succinctly and overtly by none other than
Dick Cheney: “Reagan
proved that deficits don’t matter.”
Moreover, even if I were comfortable sharing the same spectrum—or universe—of
thought with Dick, AmericanStudying reminds me of a crucial reason to engage
more fully with our collective concerns about the debt: a desire to take care
of future generations, to leave them with a world better and stronger than our
own. Such a desire is perhaps the most consistent and core element of the American Dream,
and illustrates why a tragedy like the Newtown elementary school shooting
resonantes with all Americans more deeply than any other parallel such event
(horrific as they have always been). Even more signficantly, many of our most
inspiring and influential advocates and campaigns for social change and
progress have depended precisely on appeal to that shared and collective desire—as
exemplified most poignantly by Martin
Luther King, Jr.’s dream of a better future for his and all American
children. To downplay these concerns about the world we leave subsequent
generations is thus to deny core aspects of what has both defined America and helped
us move toward our ideals.
At the same time, such narratives of debt and the future provide an
opportunity to talk about our communal priorities, and on this note too
AmericanStudying can provide inspiring examples. Whatever your political
position on Roosevelt’s
New Deal programs, it’s hard to disagree that they were developed, at a
time of economic crisis and fear, in response to precisely such questions of
priorities: the programs demonstrate an explicit emphasis on the public arts,
on infrastructure
and energy, on providing steady
and constructive jobs to as many Americans as possible and rebuilding
national spaces in the process. On the other hand, we can look to more recent
history, and specifically to how the George
W. Bush administration entered office with a substantial surplus and quickly
spent it all on the largest tax cut in national history, to illustrate the
pursuit of a very different set of priorities in response to federal and
governmental economic circumstances. Each case, like every other and like our
own moment, is specific and demands its own analysis—but what they reveal in
sum is the significance of making overt our conversations about our communal priorities,
and about how we respond to federal debt and surplus, deficit and boom, through
their lens.
Next big issue tomorrow,
Ben
PS. What do you think? Thoughts on this issue? Other questions you’d
highlight?
No comments:
Post a Comment