[As the Fall
semester of my 13th year at Fitchburg State commences, a series previewing
some of my courses and other plans for the fall. I’d love to hear about your
fall classes and plans in comments!]
[Before I begin
my third straight fall section of our Honors Lit Seminar, I couldn’t come up
with a more salient frame than that with which I concluded my second section
last December. So forgive the repeat, but I’m very excited to teach these and
many other works in Trump’s America.]
What three
under-read Gilded Age literary works can help us analyze in 2017 America.
1)
The Squatter and the Don (1885):
Back in September 2016, when it was still possible to see Donald Trump as
something of a joke, I wrote this
piece for the Huffington Post on
why Trump should read María Amparo Ruiz de Burton’s historical novel. Now that
the joke is entirely on us, it’d be that much more important for our
president-elect, and all Americans, to read a novel that can help us engage
with the longstanding histories, stories, and oppressions of Mexican
American communities. That’s not just because Trump has promised so many
policies that would target Mexican Americans and Mexico in various ways, but also
and even more importantly because works like Ruiz de Burton’s remind us that
America has always included such communities, such diversity, such
multi-lingualism, such a cross-cultural mixture. Her book, that is, not only
highlights some of our darker and more discriminatory (and sadly still all too
salient) histories, but also helps us remember how vital all our communities
have been to the nation’s greatness.
2)
“An
Experiment in Misery” and “An Experiment in
Luxury” (1894): File this entry in the “lifelong learning” category, as I
had never heard of, much less read, these two interconnected Stephen Crane short
stories until I assigned Broadview’s
edition of Maggie, a Girl of the Streets (1893)
in last year’s section of this course. While I still like Maggie for its raw and gritty realism, I think the two “Experiment”
stories—in which an unnamed youth lives for a time first as a New York homeless
man and then as part of the city’s uber-wealthy—are even more unique and
compelling. For one thing, they engage with their respective communities with a
great degree of empathy and humanity, allowing Crane to move beyond the types
and stereotypes that often come along with our images and narratives of class
at either extreme. Yet for another, “Luxury” does not let its rich characters
off the hook—even taken on its own terms, the story allows the protagonist to
understand how wealth can warp one’s social perspective; and in tandem with
“Misery,” the lesson is even clearer and more vital.
3)
“In
the Land of the Free” (c. 1900): As I detailed in that post, Sui
Sin Far’s short story offers an ironic and tragic window into Chinese
American lives, histories, and settings in the Exclusion Act era; as we
contemplate new exclusion acts of our own, we would do well to better remember
that Gilded Age law and its effects. But like all great literary works, Far’s
story isn’t limited to that particular context, and also has a great deal to
tell us about the conflict between exclusionary and inclusive narratives of
American identity. That’s a conflict I’m increasingly certain has defined our
country from its origins, and one that has returned with a vengeance in this
post-election moment of hateful rhetoric and bigoted violence. Even New York’s
wonderful Tenement Museum has witnessed xenophobic outbursts, many directed
at the museum’s images and stories of Chinese American arrivals. Whether we see
our moment as a new Gilded Age or a period with unique conflicts all its own,
there’s no doubt that we need to read Far’s story, and all these Gilded Age
authors and works, to engage with where we find ourselves today.
Next preview
tomorrow,
Ben
PS. What do you
think? Fall courses or plans you’d highlight?
No comments:
Post a Comment